Iftar at the Pejawar Mutt – R. Jagannathan

Pejwar Swami

R. JagannathanShould Hinduism unilaterally accept the validity of all religions, or offer it only on a reciprocal basis? – R. Jagannathan

Some Hindu groups have protested against the Pejawar Mutt’s head, Sri Vishwesha Tirtha Swamiji, for allowing an iftar ceremony and namaz inside the mutt’s premises. The Swami himself sees nothing wrong in this, and affirmed that he knows what Hindu dharma is. “Hinduism always talks about being good with other religions,” he said, adding, “this programme gives a clear picture that the Hindu community wants to live together in peace. Namaz was not done in the temple; it was done in the dining hall.”

The Swamiji also mentioned that Muslims had called him to preach at mosques, and inaugurate mosques in Bhatkal, Udupi, Kasargod, Mangaluru and other places.

The Swamiji’s statement, quoted at length in The Times of India, is simultaneously a tribute to the open-mindedness of Hinduism and its seers and a testimony to its naivety and inability to accept the Abrahamic religions on their own terms.

Good neighbourly behaviour with all communities is absolutely necessary, but the Swamiji brings to the fore the classic contradiction Hindus face when confronted with aggressive and expansionary religions like Islam and Christianity.

Put simply, Abrahamic religions are exclusivist, and never, never accept the truth in any other faith or spiritual enterprise. Hinduism, being open to people following their own ideas of god, or even not accepting god, is essentially liberal in its attitudes; the Abrahamic religions are closed shops.

This makes the Hindu openness a vulnerability. A liberal is supposed to believe in freedom, and this freedom is available even to those who do not believe in being liberal. Thus the fascist can use the liberal’s openness to undermine him.

Democracies face the same problem. They have to, by definition, support free speech, even blasphemy and hate speech up to a point. But this same freedom allows an Islamic State to use media to canvass for jihadis and obtain cannon fodder for their violent and murderous cause. And everyone knows that if Islamic State ever gets around to running an actual state, it will not be a liberal state. There will be no place for any other religious freedom.

German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel noted that every proposition contains within it the seeds of its own destruction, and Hinduism’s open architecture—a term used by Indian-American author and Hindu activist Rajiv Malhotra—makes it vulnerable to religions that are not so open.

The Pejawar Swamiji should thus ask himself whether, as the head of a Hindu mutt, he should be busy opening mosques and delivering lectures there. If he is going to read the Bhagavad Gita or the Vedas in those mosques, that’s a healthy sign of openness in the Muslim community; if he can gain one convert to Hinduism that will be a triumph. But if he is going to deliver homilies on good neighbourliness or some generic form of spirituality, it will be underwhelming. Every Hindu seems keen to acquire the tag of being “secular”, and the mutt’s chief seems equally vulnerable to this charm.

Hinduism has many vulnerabilities, including caste. It faces many challenges, including the aggressive conversion agendas of church and mosque.

The Swamiji should ask himself whether he should be focusing on the latter and strengthening Hinduism from within, or opening mosques to signal his secularism.

He could also ask himself: how open can Hinduism be when confronted with religions that are not open? Can Hinduism remain open if it does not counter conversion agendas with its own tools for retaining and expanding the Hindu population. Should Hinduism unilaterally accept the validity of all religions, or offer it only on a reciprocal basis?

The iftar at the mutt speaks of the large-heartedness of the Hindu approach, but it also underlines the limitations of one-sided large-heartedness. – Swarajya, 27 June 2017

Karl Popper


4 Responses

  1. For unknown reason this year our President Iftar hosting not attended by BJP. The usual Iftar hosting at Whitehouse not celebrated. Mr.Gandhiji almost embraced Islam and ready to sacrifice 10 Hindus life for the survival of one Muslim. Still the untrustworthy Muslim cheated MG in cow protection & division of Bharat. Hence the act of Swamiji is unwarranted and bring more troubles.


  2. Too bad. He should have not entertained this. This speaks volumes of his naivety. He should understand that if Sharia has it’s way, he could get killed as a Kuffr. And Hindus are the worst Kuffars because they commit the sin of “Shirk” or associating partners with Allah due to idol worship. A unpardonable sin in Islam. The people of the book or “Ahl al Kitaab” can at least by temporary protection by paying the Dhimmi tax or Jizya and agreeing to be 2nd class citizens. This option is not allowed for polytheists. They have to convert or die. Sad that seers of traditional mutts do not study as a poorvapksha the tenets of other religions and gtet themselves educated.


  3. If Muslims had called the Swamiji to inaugurate mosques and the Swami did it, it is possible to interpret it as the Swami’s acceptance of Islam and if so, its diktats against image worship. It is possible that such Muslims await the Swami’s final reformation and acceptance of Islam. It is one thing for Hindus to have good feelings for all humans regardless of their religious affiliations, and quite another for them to eagerly acclaim religions that demonise Hinduism. It is downright moronic for them to see sanctity in religions that attack Hinduism, poach on its adherents and have its ultimate destruction as their aim.


  4. The Pejawara Swami is a VHP leader. This is not surprising. The old goats of the VHP can give iftar parties for Muslims on temple premises, but they can’t persuade Muslims to allow them to build a temple for Sri Rama in Ayodhya!

    Tolerance has to be reciprocal. Otherwise it is just a manifestation of cowardice and surrender to the intolerant!

    In this day and age, Hindus suffer more from the egotism and stupidity of their leaders than they do from their enemies!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: