Sins of the DMK in Tamil Nadu – Hindu Janajagruti Samiti

Mr. Kaliagnar on a fast

The State Assembly elections are due to take place in the states of Assam, Tamilnadu, Pondicherry, Kerala and Bengal. Various political parties such as the Indian National Congress, Nationalist Congress Party, Communist Party of India, Trinamool Congress, DMK, AIADMK etc. are going to participate in it both at the National and State level. These parties are known more for their evil deeds and less for their activities in public interest. We take this opportunity to publish the misdeeds of the main political party DMK in  the Tamil Nadu state, from the matter available with us. The objective behind publishing this article is to make Hindu voters aware of the sinful activities of this political party with the help of whom the Central Government is formed, so that they remain vigilant before casting their vote at the ensuing State and Lok Sabha elections.Hindu Janajagruti Samiti

1. Hatred of Karunanidhi the DMK Chief Minister, for Hindus

1A. Karunanidhi, the Hindu hater’s disrespect for the Bhagwad Gita ! : The President of the (Dravid Munnetra Kalegham’ (DMK), M. Karunanidhi on the birthday of Srikrushna, Janmashtami proclaimed that ‘the Gita is a meaningless book’. (Sanskrutik Vartapatra, 1.11.2004)

1B. Karunanidhi, the hater of Deity Sriram !

1B 1. DMK’s anti-Hindu Karunanidhi who compared himself to Sage Valmiki is certainly a descendant of the asurs (demons) ! : ‘Ram is a character from a story. I too write novels.’ – M. Karunanidhi, Chief Minister, Tamilnadu (Dainik Sanatan Prabhat, 21.9.2007)

1B 2. Would the DMK leader Karunanidhi who claims he will continue to criticise the Ramayan dare to say the same about the ‘Quran’ or ‘Bible’ ? : ‘I have been criticising the Ramayan since childhood and will continue to do so.’ – M. Karunanidhi, Chief Minister Tamilnadu (Dainik Sanatan Prabhat, 21.7.2009)

1B 3. Karunanidhi testing the tolerance of Hindus by referring to Sriram as an imaginary character ! : ‘The Chief Minister of Tamilnadu and the President of the DMK party, M. Karunanidhi in his speech has referred to ‘Sriram as an imaginary character’.Thereafter a citizen file a police complaint against BJP MP Mr. Ramvilas Vedanti charging that he was provoking people to behead Karunanidhi, under the sections that he was trying to create disturbance in different social elements and inciting the public, which was registered by the police.’ (Dainik Sanatan Prabhat, 26.9.2007)

1B 4. After the Ramjanmabhumi verdict the rebel Karunanidhi felt odd about the peace prevailing in society and tried to project the non-existent ‘Rajaraja’ as a Dravidian king, to rekindle the Aryan-Dravidian controversy ! : ‘ There is absolutely no need now to raise the Aryan-Dravidian controversy. In South Bharat (India) several are named after Sriram as Ramaswami, Ramachandran, Ramanathan, Ramamurty, Raman etc. However in entire South Bharat only one Tamilian DMK party considers itself as Dravidian. The Malyali, Telgu and Kannad speaking people stay away from this controversy. The Bharatiya cricketer Rahul Dravid despite his surname does not consider himself Dravidian, he considers himself a Bharatiya (Indian). Just as P.Chidambaram and Mulla Mulayam felt odd about the peace after the Ramjanmabhumi verdict, so did Karunanidhi. That is precisely why he printed an objectionable poster and pasted it all over the state of Tamilnadu. In the poster he says, ‘Ram is about 17 lakh years ago. If his birthplace is decided by the judges then why can the archaeology department not determine the birthplace of Rajaraja of the Chol dynasty from the 10th century ? Chol is a descendant of the Dravidians. Rajaraja was the first to rule democratically. He empowered the people at the village level. The Aryans suppressed the Dravidians. That is why despite Rajaraja’s existence only 1 lakh years ago, his birthplace is not traceable. But as Ram was an Aryan even after 17 lakh years of his existence the judges confirm his birthplace.’ If Karunanidhi was honest then he would have borne the cost for these posters himself but this did not happen. This unnecessary endeavour has been carried out at the cost of the Government, as the appeal of the Chief Minister.’ – Shri. Arun Ramtirthakar, senior journalist, Solapur (Dainik Sanatan Prabhat, 17.10.2010)

1B 5. The Hindu hater Karunanidhi displayed his hatred for Ram by falsely projecting a non-existent ‘Rajaraja’ as a Dravidian king ! : ‘The mission of extraordinary men is important. They have no identity at birth but it is with their actions that their birthplace acquires importance. This is with respect to ordinary mortals. But Ram was the son of King Dasharath. The king was overjoyed with the birth of a son, an Incarnation (avatar). How can Ram be compared to an ordinary mortal, the so-called King Rajaraja that Karunanidhi is referring to ? If Rajaraja was so great and Tamil sanskruti (culture) was so ancient then how was this great king forgotten ? There is a long list of valorous kings like Harihar-Bukka-Pulkeshi, Ramadevaraya, Krushnadevaraya, Krushnaraj from the Rashtrakut dynasty who excavated caves in 773 A.D. etc. whose birthplaces and even deeds are hidden from the new generation. There is room for only six lines on Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj in the history textbook in schools. Tomorrow even if this matter is dropped from the textbooks Maharashtrian parents will continue to tell their children about the valorous deeds of Shivaji Maharaj. Youth clubs will continue to organise discourses on him. The Maharashtrian will never forget the Chatrapati. If Karunanidhi has such immense love for Rajaraja then he should get the education department to write a series of books on him. Let him erect statues and name roads after him. If he was a king working for the welfare of his subjects then it is not at all wrong to glorify him. The objective behind dividing into states based on language was also this. To enable every state to follow its language, tradition and conserve and develop its culture, the system of districts was stopped. Who has stopped the DMK party which is continuously in power since 1967 A.D., from glorifying Rajaraja ? Karunanidhi had absolutely no love or attachment for Rajaraja in bringing out the poster. He did this simply to vomit the venom of hatred for Ram using the Ramjanmabhumi verdict as an excuse. He is now in his nineties.Even when he is closer to the end of life it is surprising how such dirty, rotten thoughts still persist in his mind !’ – Shri Arun Ramtirthakar, senior journalist, Solapur (Dainik Sanatan Prabhat , 17.10.2010)

1B 6. The Hindu hater M. Karunanidhi called Ram imaginary when jayantis (birth anniversaries) of imaginary figures are never celebrated and when millions of Hindus have been celebrating Ramnavami for thousands of years ! : ‘Ram is our ideal. Books on imaginary men are never written. If one writer writes a novel then other writers do not steal his characters to create their own novel. Each one writes his novel independently. There are 40 main Ramayans with 400 other versions. How is it that all these have a common story ? This is the greatest evidence available, yet Karunanidhi questions, ‘Who was Ram ?’ Despite passage of so many years the story of Ram has remained the same. There may be several versions from different people but the basic skeleton of the story is the same. Yet he asks, ‘Who is Ram ?’ The jayantis of imaginary characters are never celebrated. For millions of years Hindus have been celebrating Ramnavami year after year, yet he asks, ‘Who is Ram ?’’Sage Narad has described 14 virtues of Ram. All these people are nowhwere close to even a single virtue of this Ram. How will they be able to endure him? Ram does not exist even in their names. It is really amazing that in our own country these people ask us questions about our sacred Deities. In the Mahabharat Sage Vyas has written, ‘The one who participated in the war on the side of the Pandavs is the 26th descendant of Ram.’ If Ramayan was imaginary then why would Sage Vyas write this ? Vyas and Valmiki were two different Sages. There was absolutely no need for Sage Vyas to refer to a Holy text written by Sage Valmiki. Does all this not prove that the ‘Ramayan’ was not a mere novel ?’ – Dr. Sacchidanand Shewde, the well-known Pravachankar (one who delivers discourses) (Dainik Sanatan Prabhat, 3.1.2008)

1B 7. The anti-Hindu DMK government of Tamilnadu which does nothing against Muslims involved in anti-nationalist activities but takes action against trawlers ferrying millions of Hindu devotees to catch a glimpse of the Ramsetu, their seat of worship ! : ‘6 fishermen were arrested by the Tamilnadu police for ferrying pilgrims and foreign tourists in their trawlers to see the Ramsetu, without Government permission, based on a complaint filed by the fisheries department. The police stated that the trawler owners were ferrying tourists to the controversial Ramsetu without any prior permission from the Government and without any life-saving devices for the passengers’. The licences of these fishing trawlers have been suspended and the permit for fuel supply has also been cancelled.’ (Dainik Sanatan Prabhat, 30.1.2008)

1B 8. M. Karunanidhi the anti-Hindu Chief Minister of Tamilnadu says, ‘All those who with support of God, Dharma (religion), epics and Purans (Holy Scriptures) are opposing the Setusamudram project are anti-nationalists !’ (Dainik Sanatan Prabhat, 1.7.2007)

1C. The Muslim attitude of the DMK threatening to stop processions of immersion of idols of Sri Ganesh ! : ‘To protest against the so-called provocation to behead the President of the DMK party, M. Karunanidhi for his criticism on Sriram, the supporters of the DMK threatened ‘to stop the immersion processions of Sri Siddhivinayak idols on the day of Anant Chaturdashi from Chennai city’.’ (Dainik Sanatan Prabhat, 24.9.2007)

1D. Karunanidhi’s disrespect for the highest religious leader of the Hindus ! : The Shankaracharya is an anti-nationalist – Karunanidhi (Dainik Sanatan Prabhat 1.7.2007)

2. Karunanidhi’s hatred for other states

2A. The regional-minded Karunanidhi ! : ‘In Northern Bharat religious fundamentalists are trying to create obstacles in the Setusamudran project. They are trying to replicate the situation that was created after demolition of the Babri Masjid, in Tamilnadu. M. Karunanidhi has alleged that these North Bharatiyas resent any development in South Bharat.’ (When it is the need of the hour for Hindus to unite and for building National Unity, the hatred harboured towards Hindus with the intention of dividing them regionally, by Karunanidhi calls for an inevitable intellectual revolution ! – Editor SP) (Dainik Sanatan Prabhat, 5.5.2007)

2B. ‘If M. Karunanidhi who had burnt the National flag during the agitation against Hindi language considers and calls himself a patriot, then there is nothing more unfortunate than this for this country !’ – Adv. Daulat Mutkekar, Belgaum (Dainik Sanatan Prabhat, 1.7.2007)

3. Karunanidhi and his DMK party which dishonours the Judiciary

3A. What law and order will the anti-people and lawbreaker party maintain in the state when ignoring the Supreme Court order it displayed unconstitutional conduct by organising a bandha ? : ‘ In the state of Tamilnadu despite the Supreme Court order banning bandhas the ruling DMK observed a statewide bandha on 1.10.2007. Taking cognisance of this the enraged Supreme Court proclaimed that due to defiance of the order of the Supreme Court it would not hesitate to suggest to the Central Government to impose President’s rule in the state’. (Dainik Sanatan Prabhat, 2.10.2007)

3B. The lawbreaker M. Karunanidhi’s lies in an attempt to save his government after defying the Supreme Court order ! : ‘On 1st October in support of the Setusamudram project of the Central Government the DMK leaders and the Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi had appealed for a ‘Tamilnadu bandha’. This was carried out despite the Supreme Court directives not to do so. The explanation given by M. Karunanidhi thereafter, in this era of radio and television, was that ‘ the Court order could not be conveyed to the public because of its late receipt’, was indeed ridiculous. The AIADMK leader Smt. Jayalalitha refused to accept this explanation and criticised them saying that ‘this explanation was given only out of fear and that the DMK government should be dismissed.’ (Dainik Sanatan Prabhat , 7.10.2007)

3C. A slap on the face of the DMK by the Madras High Court that ‘the Gayatri mantra belongs to the entire human race’ when the DMK tried to humiliate the mantra as ‘unconstitutional’! : ‘The Gayatri mantra is not meant for a particular religion, sect, dynasty, caste or society, it is meant for the entire human race. That is why its use by a Government or a semi-government office or its publication on an invitation card etc. is not against the constitution of Bharat’. This is an important verdict given by the Judge of the Madras High Court D.Raju on 30th August 1992. In his judgement Justice D.Raju stated that’felicitating someone with a Gayatri mantra is not against the secular nature of the Constitution’ and dismissed the petition. In 1983 the United Insurance Company had printed 5000 Deepavali greeting cards with the Gayatri mantra on it and the DMK had protested against this saying that ‘publishing the Gayatri mantra on a greeting card was unconstitutional’. The Justice described the ‘Gayatri mantra as Shabdhabrahman (God in the form of a word) !’ and added, ‘This mantra (of Vishwamitra) from the Rugveda is thekey to Vedic knowledge. It is inappropriate to say that the Gayatri mantra is associated with a particular religion. From times immemorial the Vedas have been considered the heritage of humanity and are not limited to a particular religion. There is nothing to prove that the Gayatri mantra is the right or property of a particular class, caste or society.” In his judgement the Justice has shown that ‘secularism’ does not mean absence of religion or being against a religion. The essence of this is only that the Government should not be linked to any one particular religion !’ (Masik Dharmabhaskar, October 1992) (Dainik Sanatan Prabhat , 16.9.2007)

3D. When A. Raja a DMK leader threatens the Justice and the Judiciary does nothing about this, how will the public have faith in the Judiciary ? : ‘Justice of the Madras High Court Khalifulla in one of his judgements has said, ‘the DMK leader and former Telecommunications Minister A. Raja involved in the 2-G Spectrum scam which has caused a loss of 1 lakh 76 thousand crores of rupees to the country had threatened Justice Raghupati’. As per the news on 2.7.2009 Justice Raghupati had written to the then Deputy Collector K.G. Balakrushnan that in connection with a scam a Central Minister named Raja had telephoned him in an attempt to influence .’ (Dainik Sanatan Prabhat, 8.12.2010)

4. Anti-Hindu Karunanidhi promoting reservations

4A. Tamilnadu’s communal Chief Minister, M. Karunanidhi, allotting reservations to Christians and Muslims in the name of social equality, pretending to bring about a so-called social revolution ! : ‘30% reservation in Government jobs is for the backward classes. Resolutions were passed in the Tamilnadu Assembly that out of these 3 ½ % jobs would be given to Muslims and 3 ½% to Christians. This resolution was passed unanimously by voice vote. When addressing the House on this occasion the Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi said, “I have started building a statue of social equality. I am chiselling its parts one by one. When I will create eyes for this statue this social revolution will acquire a closely set purpose. The people of Tamilnadu are waking up slowly. When they open their eyes wide and look at the world, the social revolution will have been accomplished.’ – Shri. Arvind Vithal Kulkarni, senior journalist , Mumbai. (Saptahik Sanatan Prabhat, year 2007 A.D., Issue no. 50)

4B. The anti-Constitutional and communal Chief Minister of Tamilnadu M. Karunanidhi giving reservations to Muslims and Christians in the name of religion, trampling upon the Constitutional clauses ! : ‘On 13th September 2007 the Tamilnadu Chief Minister passed an ordinance that 3 ½ % reservations each would be allotted to Muslims and Christians in State educational institutions and Government offices. (Dainik Sanatan Prabhat, 14.9.2007)

5. Karunanidhi’s hatred for temples

5A. The Anti-Hindu Chief Minister of Tamilnadu M. Karunanidhi eager to grab the land in the possession of Hindu Charitable Institutions ! : ‘Dr. Jagan Kaul of ‘Hindu Jagran Forum’ from America wrote a letter to the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu M. Karunanidhi on ‘The right to decide about the use of land and other wealth of Hindu temples’. Dr. Kaul in this letter has stated that he was drawing Mr. Karunanidhi’s attention to the fact that the departments of the State and Central Governments were demanding the land in the possession of the Hindu Charitable Institutions in Chennai. He stated further that Hindu temples and their wealth were created by ancestors of Hindus over hundreds of years. So only Hindus have the right to them. He emphasised that this wealth had to be used for renovation of temples and the benefit of Hindu society. The Government’s attempt to control them meant breaking the existing laws. The State Government is defying the Constitution by depriving Hindus of their religious independence and is looting their wealth and property.’ (Dainik Sanatan Prabhat, 4.9.2009)

5B. The anti-Hindu Government of Tamilnadu will allot contracts to private organisations to maintain cleanliness in temples thus allowing workers of other religions to enter the them ! : ‘The Tamilnadu Government will choose private organisations in the State to maintain cleanliness in temples.’ – R. Periyakaruppan, Minister for Hindu and religious organisations. (Dainik Sanatan Prabhat, 14.11.2009)

Are Hindus allowed to clean mosques?

5C. The Anti-Hindu Tamilnadu Chief Minister Karunanidhi of DMK appointing Muslim Ministers to manage the affairs of Hindu temples who are in majority, and to grab their wealth! : ‘The law of Government taking over Hindus temples has been existing in Tamilnadu since the British rule. As there is was no clause ‘that the Minister managing this portfolio should be a Hindu, presently a Muslim Minister is looking after the activities of the temple. A lot of wealth from Hindu temples has been grabbed by those in power.’ (Dainik Sanatan Prabhat, 22.4.2007)

6. Karunanidhi the promoter of a dynasty in politics

6A. Karunanidhi changing democracy to a dynasty in politics ! : ‘Chief Minister Karunanidhi of the DMK party was from the very beginning insisting on granting of maximum ministerial berths in the State Government to his children from three wives. He was interested in giving the Central Ministerial posts to seven of his family members. That is why he had boycotted the swearing–in ceremony of the Cabinet Ministers on 22nd May.’ (Arya Niti, 10.11.2009)

6B. The undemocratic Karunanidhi encouraging dynasties in politics by giving ministerial posts to his own sons and daughters ! : ‘Azagiri, A. Raja and Dayanidhi Maran, sons of Karunanidhi of DMK, will be given the posts of Cabinet Ministers and his daughter, Kanimozi and three others will be sworn in as State Cabinet Ministers in the Central Ministry of the 15th Loksabha.’ (Dainik Sanatan Prabhat, 25.5.2009)

7. Overthrow the corrupt Congress President Sonia Gandhi and Karunanidhi, President of the DMK who are looting the public of their hard-earned money

‘The Congress President Sonia Gandhi, the DMK President Karunanidhi and A. Raja have looted 36000 crores, 18000 crores and 6000 crores respectively in the ‘2-G Spectrum’ scam. Sonia Gandhi has divided her share of money into two equal parts of 18000 crores each and deposited them in the names of her two sisters living abroad.’ – Dr. Subramanyam Swami, President, Rashtriya Janata Party. (Dainik Sanatan Prabhat, 31.12. 2010)

8. Karunanidhi considers the 2-G Spectrum scam ordinary, as if it is nothing

‘The former Telecommunications Minister A. Raja forwarded the resignation of his post in the DMK when under arrest in the ‘2-G Spectrum’ scam. However the party President Karunanidhi did not accept it. On the contrary he blamed the ‘Opposition’ saying that they were simply making a ‘mountain out of a molehill’.’ (Dainik Sanatan Prabhat, 4.2.2011)

9. Instead of giving his son a Dravidian name DMK President Karunanidhi, a Dravidian protagonist chose to give his son the name of a Russian dictator

‘None will call the leader of DMK and the Chief Minister Karunanidhi who is protecting his relative A. Raja who has swindled 90 thousand crores of rupees in the ‘2-G Spectrum’ scam, and is threatening the Congress that he has to be given the same portfolio again, a clean person. At the centre he gives all the Ministerial berths allotted to his party to his relatives and in the state he is the Chief Minister and his son, the Deputy Chief Minister. This is his way of meting out justice to his party workers. His son named Stalin was born when the dictator Stalin was in power in Russia. He is such a staunch protagonist of Dravidian culture, but when naming his son he chose a Russian name instead of a Dravidian one. This is the way he loves Dravidian culture or the State.’ – Shri. Arun Ramtirthakar, senior journalist, Solapur (Dainik Sanatan Prabhat, 17.10.2010)

10. The hypocrite, Dravidian politician who accepts the Dashagranthi Brahman, Ravan as God but promotes a revolution against Brahmans

The hypocrisy of love for Dravidian culture was also seen in the mentor of Karunanidhi, the DMK leader Anna Durai and his guide, E.V. Ramaswami. Ramaswami founded the Dravid Kalagham Party. They accepted Ravan as God because he was Dravidian and called Ram a demon. In 1968 this Ramaswami led a procession in Salem keeping an idol of Deity Ramachandra on a truck. He was sitting beside the idol and hitting it with slippers. What is amusing is that the Ravan he worshipped was a Dashagranthi Brahman; yet he had started a revolution against Brahmans. Anna Durai started a revolution for an independent ‘Dravidistan’. He banned Hindi calling it the language of the Aryans from the North. To make things easier in politics he founded the DMK (Dravid Munnetra Kalagham) party. In 1976 he came to power and took the oath as the Chief Minister to maintain an undivided Bharat. Though he gave up the demand for an independent Dravidistan the opposition to Hindi persisted and it is still existing there.’ – Shri. Arun Ramtirthakar, senior journalist, Solapur. (Dainik Sanatan Prabhat, 17.10.2010)

11. How will the untrustworthy Karunanidhi give a clean administration when despite Prabhakaran continuing terrorist activities in Sri Lanka for several years he betrayed the people’s trust by saying ‘he is not a terrorist’?

‘ The Chief of Liberation Tigers of Tamil Elam (LTTE) Prabhakaran is my friend and he is not a terrorist.’ – Karunanidhi, Chief Minister, Tamilnadu. (Dainik Sanatan Prabhat, 21.4.200. – Hindu Janajagruti Samiti, Chennai, April 9, 2010


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: