• Ram Lalla Virajman
  • Voice of India
  • Free Books
  • Operation Sindoor

    Pakistan pleads for Trump's help.
  • Hindu Nationalism

    It (is) not easy … to draw a line between Hindu nationalism and true nationalism. The two overlap as India is the only home of Hindus and they form a majority there. — J. Nehru 

  • Lord Buddha was every inch a Hindu

    Sakyamuni Buddha
  • Animal Slaughter

    Those who permit slaying of animals; those who bring animals for slaughter; those who slaughter; those who sell meat; those who purchase meat; those who prepare dishes out of meat; those who serve that meat and those who eat it are all murderers. — Manusmriti

  • Jesus in India?

    Jesus
  • Tainted Teresa

    Mother Teresa
  • Word of God?

    When I think of all the harm the Bible has done, I despair of ever writing anything to equal it.” — Oscar Wilde

    Christianity is the most ridiculous, the most absurd and bloody religion that has ever infected the world. — Voltaire

    Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined, imprisoned, [molested]: yet we have not advanced one inch towards humanity. What has been the effect of coercion? To make one half of the world fools, and the other half hypocrites. To support error and roguery all over the earth. — Thomas Jefferson

  • Homos & Hinduism

    Beware of alien Christian morals – Swami Aksharananda
  • National Shame!

    Mukherjee & Santa
  • Mohd Posters Iran

    Posters of Mohd exist in Iran & Egypt
  • Islamic terrorism

    How to wipe out Islamic terror
  • Tolerance Paradox

    Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. […] We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. — Karl Popper

  • India Crossed Out!

    India Crossed-Out!
  • Ambedkar Says …

    The methods adopted by the invaders have left behind them their aftermath. One aftermath is the bitterness between the Hindus and the Muslims which they have caused. This bitterness, between the two, is so deep-seated that a century of political life has neither succeeded in assuaging it; nor in making people forget it. As the invasions were accompanied with destruction of temples and forced conversions, with spoliation of property, with slaughter, enslavement and abasement of men, women and children, what wonder if the memory of these invasions has ever remained green, as a source of pride to the Muslims and as a source of shame to the Hindus?  — B. R. Ambedkar

  • Jesus: An Artifice for Aggression

    Jesus Christ Cover

Human rights cannot be an excuse for terrorism – Ravi Shankar

Counter-terrorism threatens human rights.

Ravi ShankarLiberal societies have been historically soft on terror. In India for decades, the Congress and other secular governments—even Vajpayee’s—refused to retaliate to terror attacks. Not anymore. Pakistan, which sponsors terrorism in the subcontinent has accused India of exterminating wanted terrorists on its soil, in violation of the UN Charter. – Ravi Shankar

Decoding the polemic of conscience is fraught with pathos and pitfalls. Human rights, once the scourge of autocrats, is being haunted by the clichéd question: is one man’s terrorist another man’s freedom fighter? Last week, Amnesty International condemned Israel for the death of Walid Daqqa, a Palestinian terrorist who kidnapped, tortured and mutilated Israeli soldier Moshe Tamam, by gouging our his eyes and castrating him.

Amnesty, the global torchbearer of human rights is banned in India for money laundering. The human rights space itself is blurred by ideological incongruities; many UN staff in Gaza turned out to be Hamas terrorists, some of whom even took part in the October attacks in Israel. UN experts recently condemned Israeli drone strikes that killed Hamas deputy leader Saleh al-Arouri.

Liberal societies have been historically soft on terror. In India for decades, the Congress and other secular governments—even Vajpayee’s—refused to retaliate to terror attacks. Not anymore. Pakistan, which sponsors terrorism in the subcontinent has accused India of exterminating wanted terrorists on its soil, in violation of the UN Charter. There is an Israeli parallel to this. After the massacre of Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics by Palestinian killers, Israel launched ‘Operation Wrath of God’ to hunt down and eliminate the murderers. It took 20 years.

Again the Israelis are hunting down and killing every single perpetrator of the October 7 barbarities. Hamas knows its leaders are dead men walking. Pakistan’s ISI is now figuring that Mossad tactics can be xeroxed. On April 5, Defence minister Rajnath Singh declared, “If any terrorist from a neighbouring country tries to disturb India or carry out terrorist activities here [and] escapes to Pakistan, we will go to Pakistan and kill him there.” Just as Modi’s opponents fear the ED at home, there is fear in Islamabad.

So, is the secret poisoning of Sajid Mir, a mastermind of the Mumbai attacks in which 170 people were killed, a violation of human rights?

Is the killing in Karachi of JeM terrorist Zahoor Mistry, a hijacker of an Indian Airlines plane, violation of human rights?

Is the killing of Babbar Khalsa operative Ripudaman Singh Malik, who allegedly bombed an Air India flight in 1985, which killed 329 people, a human rights violation?

Is the shooting of Bashir Ahmad Peer, Hizbul Mujahideen’s “launching chief” who recruited, trained and infiltrated terrorists and arms and ammunition into Kashmir valley, a human rights violation?

The concept of human rights goes back to 539 BC, when great Persian king Cyrus the Great conquered Babylon. Instead of massacring all men and children and carting off the women as slaves, Cyrus freed them all, announced their right to adopt their religion of choice and established racial equality. The translation of his laws, inscribed in the baked-clay Cyrus Cylinder, correspond to the first four Articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of the UN.

Therein lies the crux of the human rights paradox: political will. After the Mumbai attacks, Manmohan Singh’s Congress-led government dithered on a counter strike on Pakistan and ultimately stayed away in the name of maturity and self-restraint. It simply lacked the political will to avenge its murdered citizens. King Cyrus could have wiped Babylon from the face of the earth, but chose not to. That was his strength. Human rights is the principle of championing individuals oppressed by autocrats or murdered in prison like Russian lawyer Alexei Navalny was, not giving an excuse to murderers to wreak havoc in the name of defending oppression. That’s human wrongs. – The New Indian Express, 14 April 2024

Paradox of Tolerance