• Ram Lalla Virajman
  • Voice of India
  • Free Books
  • Operation Sindoor

    Pakistan pleads for Trump's help.
  • Hindu Nationalism

    “It (is) not easy … to draw a line between Hindu nationalism and true nationalism. The two overlap as India is the only home of Hindus and they form a majority there.” — J. Nehru 

  • Lord Buddha was every inch a Hindu

    Sakyamuni Buddha
  • Animal Slaughter

    Those who permit slaying of animals; those who bring animals for slaughter; those who slaughter; those who sell meat; those who purchase meat; those who prepare dishes out of meat; those who serve that meat and those who eat it are all murderers. — Manusmriti

  • Jesus in India?

    Jesus
  • Tainted Teresa

    Mother Teresa
  • Word of God?

    When I think of all the harm the Bible has done, I despair of ever writing anything to equal it.” — Oscar Wilde

    “Christianity is the most ridiculous, the most absurd and bloody religion that has ever infected the world.” — Voltaire

    “Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined, imprisoned, [molested]: yet we have not advanced one inch towards humanity. What has been the effect of coercion? To make one half of the world fools, and the other half hypocrites. To support error and roguery all over the earth.” — Thomas Jefferson

  • Homos & Hinduism

    Beware of alien Christian morals – Swami Aksharananda
  • National Shame!

    Mukherjee & Santa
  • Mohd Posters Iran

    Posters of Mohd exist in Iran & Egypt
  • Islamic terrorism

    How to wipe out Islamic terror
  • Tolerance Paradox

    Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. […] We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. — Karl Popper

  • India Crossed Out!

    India Crossed-Out!
  • Truth Be Told

    ‘The methods adopted by the invaders have left behind them their aftermath. One aftermath is the bitterness between the Hindus and the Muslims which they have caused. This bitterness, between the two, is so deep-seated that a century of political life has neither succeeded in assuaging it; nor in making people forget it. As the invasions were accompanied with destruction of temples and forced conversions, with spoliation of property, with slaughter, enslavement and abasement of men, women and children, what wonder if the memory of these invasions has ever remained green, as a source of pride to the Muslims and as a source of shame to the Hindus?” – Dr. B. R. Ambedkar

  • Jesus: An Artifice for Aggression

    Jesus Christ Cover

Was Sanskrit the language of the masses in ancient India? – Ram Abloh

Sanskrit-speaking Mattur village in Karnataka

SanskritSanskrit was the language of the streets, of traders and philosophers, of prostitutes and saints, of farmers and kings, of housewives and warriors in ancient India. – Ram Abloh

Sanskrit was the spoken language of ancient India, in spite of what the modern miscreants would like you to be indoctrinated with. The feature that distinguishes a spoken language from a purely literary or artificially constructed language is that the former quickly develops variants, whereas the latter is frozen forever. All other great languages in the history of the world have had variants – such as accents (variants in pronunciation), lexicons (variants in choice of vocabulary), registers (variants in style based on purpose or social setting), and dialects (variants that are geographical with a combination of one or more of accent, lexicon and register). English, for example, has 28 variants just within England! (not including Scotland, Ireland, Wales, North America and Australia). Now, English was born around the 7th century AD, so it has been active for about 1400 years.

Sanskrit has been around since at least 3000 BC (based on astronomical evidence in Vedic & post-Vedic literature), so it was the de facto language of a vast portion of the Indian subcontinent. It was actively spoken well into the early centuries AD. So it has been active for at least 3500 years. Also, India is about 30 times the size of England. So I don’t think it is unreasonable to allow for a few regional variants to sprout up through 3500 years and a vast landmass.

SanskritEvidence for Sanskrit having been a spoken language is abundant. There are hundreds of everyday words in the Vedas that do not serve any religious purpose. Similes and metaphors use everyday words. If Sanskrit was not a commonly spoken language but only a strictly liturgical language, such everyday words would not exist, as they would not serve any religious function. So you see, a great living tradition such as the Vedic culture cannot have thrived if Sanskrit was a sterile language that was only used by “priests in temples.” Sanskrit was the language of the streets and the elites, of traders and philosophers, of prostitutes and saints, of farmers and kings, of housewives and warriors.

Much more of this discussion on Quora. – Hinduism Today, 15 August 2018

» Ram Abloh is a human being who posts on Quora.

Distribution of Sanskrit in Asia
Being Human


2 Responses

  1. Sita Ram Goel and Ram Swarup maintained that Sanskrit should have been made the national language, not Hindi.

    Every Indian language has some Sanskrit vocabulary or association, though the speakers may not be aware of it.

    Every Hindu child has a Sanskrit name.

    Therefore Sanskrit is not a strange language to any Indian.

    Is Mr Modi listening? Because nobody in Tamil Nadu is listening to his Hindi!

    Like

Leave a comment