Debutante Dharma-Gurus: Violating a civilisational patent – Sandhya Jain

“Today the gravest threat to Hindu dharma comes from Indian passport holding Sanyasis with trans-national and trans-religious sympathies. They profess great solicitude for their white foreign or rich PIO bhaktas and the creature comforts accruing from this allegiance (first class air fares, limousines at the other end, five star accommodation, etc). They openly engage foreign faiths and governments in dialogue, the aims, objectives and outcomes of which are hidden from Hindu Indians, and brazenly dismiss the grave threat posed to Hindu dharma on Bharat bhumi by trans-national ideologies and religions.” – Sandhya Jain

Nithy teaching yoga to RanjithaThe pornographic scandal involving the globe-trotting Nityananda, a founder-member of the Global Foundation for Civilisational Harmony (GFCH) and close associate of Swami Dayananda Saraswati, convener, Hindu Dharma Acharya Sabha, has violated the most profound civilisational patents of the Sanatana Dharma with frightening nonchalance.

So extreme is the trivialization of the issues involved in the scandal, so insistent the clamour by those without adhikāra to declaim upon Dharma on this bhumi, that we need first and foremost to assert unequivocally the inalienable relationship between Dharma, Bharat Bhumi and Bharat Jana (people). Who, according to Hindu tradition, has the right to speak for Hindu dharma on Hindu bhumi is the crux of our concern.

Dharma vests in the Jambudvipa of Bharat

In Hindu tradition, a human being’s true identity is spiritual and transcendental, and can be realised only inwardly in terms of his relationship to the Absolute (parabrahman). But in the material world, man’s identity is psycho-physical and social; this bestows him with the ritual eligibility (adhikāra) to act to attain the goals of human existence (purusarthas). Critical to any discussion of the identity of a people is their self-image and self-definition, in which their perception of their geography plays a crucial role.

Indians have from hoary times made a distinction between natives and foreigners, based not on racial awareness but upon the unique character of the Indian ethos. Modern race consciousness of skin and colour was never part of Hindu tradition (hence the resistance to the colonial imposition of the Aryan race theory). The Rgveda Samhita uses the word ‘Arya’ to denote a pious householder; the term evolved to mean noble, cultured, a contrast to the mleccha or barbarian/outsider.

Hindu tradition subsumes all primal identities of jana (clan, tribe, later people or viśah) and gotra (also clan, tribe) in the pan-India Varna system – a hierarchy that is socio-ethical and ritual, but not ethnic. Being embedded or estranged from the Varna system marks the Indian from the foreigner; the system of Monarchy also welded smaller clan identities into a larger socio-political and cultural whole. Traditional social identity was thus associated with Varnasrama dharma, gotra, janapada; this underlay social and ritual rights and obligations, adhikāra

All Hindu ritual begins with a resolve (sankalpa) in which one recalls one’s place in space and time. The traditional formula recalls one’s belonging to Jambudvipa or Bharatvarsa. Jambudvipa is the primordial unity of the Hindu, Buddhist and Jaina streams. In Buddhist tradition, the Buddhas and Cakkavattis (chakravartins) can be born ONLY in Jambudvipa. The Jain concept of Jambudvipa is larger and includes Bharata as one of its seven regions. Bharata is divided into six regions; the Tirthankaras and Cakravartins are born in the Arya janapadas alone.

Puranas divide the earth into seven dvipas (regions, not islands); Jambudvipa is the centre and is divided into nine Varsas; Bharata is one of them. Bharatavarsa is named after the legendary Bharata and is defined as the land north of the ocean and south of Himalayas (Vishnupurana 2.3.1). Here the system of four Varnas, Caturvarnya, operates; hence it is the only place where proper practice of religion is possible as Varnasrmadharma makes the performance of svadharma possible. Hence Bharata alone is karmabhumi.

In other countries, bhoga is possible, but not karma, as without adhikāra, karma is not possible. One cannot tread the path of emancipation without treading the path of karma. The samkalpamantra recalls the obligations to which one is heir by virtue of being born in Bharatavarsa, and of the eligibility won by that place in moral and religious life.

Bharat is thus a geo-cultural region where natural and cultural frontiers correspond in terms of the Himalayas and the sea; but in the north-west and north-east, the natural frontiers are not so clear and even today merge into the lands of the barbarians who do not use Sanskrit or follow the four-fold order….

Trans-national Hindus and trans-national loyalties of globe-trotting gurus

This civilisational patent – that Bharat alone is the punyabhumi where dharma can be practiced properly, because here alone karma can be expiated by Hindus living on this bhumi – is being grossly violated by sanctimonious globetrotting swamis and rich officious Hindus who quit this bhumi for foreign soil and citizenship. Guided by unseen but readily discernible forces, these ex-Indians seek to impose monotheistic ideologies, systems, values and mindsets upon Indian Hindus – to facilitate the geo-political concerns of their white masters who wish to continue to dominate the world any which way – though they have no adhikāra to do so.

Today therefore, the gravest threat to Hindu dharma comes from Indian passport holding Sanyasis with trans-national and trans-religious sympathies. They profess great solicitude for their white foreign or rich PIO bhaktas and the creature comforts accruing from this allegiance (first class air fares, limousines at the other end, five star accommodation, etc). They openly engage foreign faiths and governments in dialogue, the aims, objectives and outcomes of which are hidden from Hindu Indians, and brazenly dismiss the grave threat posed to Hindu dharma on Bharat bhumi by trans-national ideologies and religions.

Once the Nityananda sex scandal broke out on March 2, 2010, the ‘swami’ disappeared and a few days later issued a puerile statement to the effect that he had done nothing ‘illegal;’ this firmly established his guilt in the public domain. It was the duty of Hindu Dharma Acharya Convener (HDAS) convener Swami Dayananda Saraswati (who unlike Nityananda belongs to a proper religious lineage and has had training in Vedic religion and culture), to ask the self-proclaimed ‘self-realised’ Nityananda to remove his saffron robes and return to civil society, being unfit to uphold the parampara of a sanyasi.

Hindu tradition permits certain priests and preceptors to marry. But Nityananda perpetuated a fraud by posing as a brahmachari (celibate) and jeevan-mukta (released from the bondage of life and death while still living in the world). Doubts were voiced in private about his character and spiritual attainments long before the current scandal broke (he represents no Vedic parampara or rishiacharya tradition); but he was given a global platform in the Global Foundation for Civilisational Harmony.

The GFCH is most likely an enterprise of Swami Dayananda, as it is unlikely that either the Dalai Lama or former President APJ Abdul Kalam (or for that matter Sri Sri Ravishankar; Acharya Mahapragya; Archbishop Cardinal Oswald Gracias; Guru Baba Ramdev; Maulana Mahmood Madani; Mata Amritanandmayi Devi; Paramhamsa Nityananda; Rabbi Ezekiel Isaac Malekar or patron Zena Sorabjee) would have taken the initiative to bring this group together. Hence it is almost certain that it is he who invited Nityananda to form part of this august gathering, and he is therefore accountable for Nityananda’s conduct.

It is going to be a terrible embarrassment for the Hindu community when the other religious leaders and founder-members meet and remove the impugned swami, if he does not resign with grace. Already much damage has been done, and cannot be repaired, as the actress in the sex video is a married lady who has confessed voluntary and regular relations with Nityananda. That has effectively ended the feeble claims of compromised videos and explains the inaction against Sun TV and Dinakaran!

Swami Dayananda, convener, Hindu Dharma Acharya Sabha (HDAS), has maintained an unacceptable silence in this sordid episode. Despite this writers demands that Swamiji speak up, accept personal responsibility for promoting a sweet talker without formal religious training as a ‘global guru,’ and resign as convener, HDAS, he opted to hide in the shadows. Instead, some useful idiots were deployed to threaten me with a defamation case!

Even worse, a self-educated Global Hindu (person with citizenship of a white Christian nation and no academic or religious training in Hindu traditions, but is closely associated with Swami Dayananda and promoted in HDAS for unknown reasons) was deployed to declaim, via the internet, the official excuses for Nityananda. At first this officious person asked everyone to shut up and floated a silly video interview with Nityananda, who was hiding from official enquiries but was available to the Global Hindu! This went down badly with Indian officialdom, especially as rumours flew thick and fast that Nityananda was getting refuge with a religious leader (sic) in Haridwar, where an internationally famous lawyer was invited for legal consultation!

Reading the mood of ashram inmates, the Global Hindu backtracked and asked Nityananda to resign all official positions in his set up. He did not know that in Hindu tradition, a fallen monk must renounce the saffron robe and return to civil society – a punishment worse than death for sensitive souls. (It is what the writer demanded of Swami Dayananda when she discovered him making a mockery of Hindu tradition in the name of an oxymoron called Inter-Faith Dialogue, which shall be the subject of a future article).

Global Hindu went further in his ignorance (avidya). Some years ago, ‘guided’ by white superiors, he had peddled a blueprint for cutting and chopping the vast Hindu spiritual universe into a corporate hierarchy with a single point of control that would be easier to ‘manage.’ By whom, he did not say, but it didn’t need Einstein to figure that out.

All this was part of a larger effort to install Swami Dayananda Saraswati as a Hindu Pope, make him the Sole Recognised Voice of Hindu India, and then impose the agenda of the so-called Global Hindu upon hapless Bharat. Persons like the writer saw through this charade from the very first; needless to say, we have not been popular with Swami Dayananda and his foreign bhaktas/friends.

Global Hindu-speak: Equating Hindu Dharma with tantric sex!

Global Hindu took the most astonishing route to defend/explain Nityananda’s sex-with-a- married-woman act. I suspect this is part of a pre-planned agenda to sensationalise Hindu dharma by equating it with something called Tantric Sex, and thus demonise and diminish it in the eyes of Hindu bhaktas – something reminiscent of Max Mueller’s project to interpret the Vedas in a manner that would scandalize and humiliate English-educated Hindus. It seems that the White Man – burdened with the task of ruling and ruining the Creation – is unable to invent a new modus operandi despite such a long criminal innings!

Anyway, Global Hindu said ‘the relationships between siddhis (extraordinary yogic powers), morality, Tantra and sex’ is the framework in which to interpret Nityananda. Under cover of a dialogue with Art of Living founder Sri Sri Ravi Shankar (whose spiritual lineage is also unknown), Global Hindu suggested that there is NO connection between yogic powers (siddhis) and morality, because siddhis are a scientific phenomena in the sense that these powers can be harnessed by anyone, and ‘science’ deals with truths that are morally neutral. Comparing chalk to cheese, he said Einstein’s immoral life would not invalidate his scientific theories. He ‘proved’ his argument saying great siddhas like Ravana lacked morality.

Sri Sri said something equally inane. Had either gentleman a modicum of Hindu learning, he would know that siddhis are acquired after great tapas, from the benevolence of the great Devas and Devis, and are not a mechanical acquisition like power on a solar energy panel. Further, since the purpose of tapas and dhyana (meditation) is to move beyond acquisition of siddhis (which only indicate the level of attainment), the misuse of siddhis by Asuras and Danavas is dealt with via the karmic process, which is why such formidable entities are invariably defeated. The karmic trajectory is not morally neutral at all.

Global Hindu then asked Sri Sri (whose religious-academic credentials are unknown), if the Shiva Sutras are valid? Now, those who think Global Hindu has the adhikāra to pontificate on Hindu Dharma in India must surely realise that the very question is un-Hindu and is consistent with the Church objective of vilifying Hindu dharma in parts to ultimately de-legitimise the whole. The Shiva Sutras are valid for Shiva bhaktas, and that is it. The 112 spiritual enlightenment techniques taught therein, with 6 delineating sexual contact between male yogi and female yogini, are for seekers on that path. They are not for everyone even within the Shaiva Sampradaya, are not imposed on everyone, and cannot be denied to those who seek.

No one, much less a non-Indian, should have the temerity to try to create Canon Law (Christian [religious] law) in Hindu dharma by asking if any part of dharma is valid (or should be banned?). The American Deepak Chopra is free to entertain his clients with sexual gymnastics; his marketing techniques do not reflect the essence or even part of Hindu dharma.

As for the view that Adi Sankara integrated the Vedic and Tantric traditions, I can only say I am saddened that the defence of the indefensible Nityananda has come to this. It is being claimed Nityananda used Tantric techniques to arouse body energies; if he was doing this with lay bhaktas with no knowledge of what they were getting into, and with foreigners who have no conception of dharma but only crave the exotic, one can only ponder the wisdom of those who promoted this man to such an exalted position on the national and international stage. (Indeed, this is precisely the reason why some of us have been demanding that globetrotting swamis immediately cease and desist from speaking on behalf of Hindu Dharma in international fora; they diminish the grandeur and complexity of the tradition to make it conform to the desires of politically savvy white men and women pretending to be bhaktas).

Global Hindu is pleased that Tantra is being subjected to the clinical experimentation of psychologists and other scientists examining latent human energies and potentials. This is surely something likely to be misused in places like Guantanamo Bay; do recall that the US was the foremost buyer of Nazi concentration camp medical literature!

I found it distasteful that Global Hindu could term our Naga Sadhus as ‘completely naked’ (his italics). A native Hindu would know that the sadhu is digambar – sky-clad. He made it worse by saying he did not regard the sadhus as ‘either vulgar or primitive’ and that Hindu orthodoxy is contradictory because it rejects Tantra in public and respects Naga sadhus and various symbols and rituals rooted in Tantra. This is Christian gibberish at its best; it is impossible to answer such intellectual vacuity.

After this buildup, Global Hindu defended the meditation techniques taught by Nityananda, adding that there is ‘nothing inherent about sex that is rejected by Hinduism across the board…’ as brahmacharya (sexual abstinence) is just one spiritual path… Amidst a mountain of obfuscation, Global Hindu slyly lets out that Nityananda confessed to him that the Shiva Sutras have two categories of techniques. While most sutras do not involve physical contact with another person, for a small number of persons the 6 sutras involving sexual Tantra need to be tested and perfected for modern times, before they can be safely taught more widely; Nityananda considered this a legitimate R&D as is done in a lab for developing a product!

I have never heard anything so obscene in my life. This R&D obviously has a white western audience in mind; Devi alone knows what all he did and with whom. It seems fair to conclude that the perversion was on a fairly large scale, as Global Hindu reveals: ‘I believe that he even entered into written legal contracts with them to make sure that both parties were clear about the arrangement. The reason for this “Non-Disclosure Agreement” was to make sure that someone who willingly approaches him for Tantra does not later accuse him of physical contact..

This is appalling. A Hindu guru actually sought and took legal advice and ordered the drafting of a legal document that would ‘empower’ him to have sex with men and/or women disciples without legal hassles! To be legally valid, such documents would have been attested by a Public Notary or Oath Commissioner, this merits an official enquiry. Doubtless what happened in these ‘classes’ was reminiscent of Caligula’s Rome! For Global Hindu to mischievously equate Tantra with Sex by Mutual Consent is disgraceful.

Nityananda, we are told, became a celebrity seven years ago on account of his oratory (and sexual prowess?). In USA, his ‘healing powers’ drew doctors, businessmen, IT professionals, corporate executives with terminal illnesses into his fold. Global Hindu says he used his money for social work which frustrated missionary activity in Tamil Nadu; he goes into much verbiage about blackmail threats & sexually explicit videos… What emerges clearly is that Global Hindu was friendly with this sanyasi and ‘helping’ his career over the years …

Global Hindu-speak: Outsource Hindu Dharma to white devotees!

We now come to the real agenda of Global Hindu, and all Hindu acharyas who do not speak out firmly and unequivocally against it will be complicit in the white Christian design to decimate Hindu Dharma on this punyabhumi. This specifically applies to the Hindu Dharma Acharya Sabha which has, over the years, unilaterally and gratuitously been promoting the mediocre intellectualism of the Global Hindu, including an utterly forgettable book that he has been marketing assiduously in the course of his religious diplomacy (read back-scratching club) with global gurus.

To come straight to the point, this management consultant turn eminent researcher (whatever that means), now declaims in his stentorian tones that Nityananda’s problem was that he got ‘persons with Brahmin qualities performing duties that demand Kshatriya and Vaishnav [vaishya] skills…’ The ashram leaders, he said, lacked the professional competence required to manage a rapidly growing global enterprise (it’s all about money, honey). What was needed was not Brahmin (ascetic) but Kshatriya (combative, to protect the moolah) qualities.

And it is the white devotees (naturally!) who have Kshatriyata or leadership expertise, courage and commitment. (I am not going to say ‘I told you so,’ but Swami Dayananda does owe a personal apology and a personal explanation for unleashing the dogs of war on those of us who questioned the undue eminence of ex-Indians and non-Indian ‘Hindus’ in his close entourage, and his mis-use of HDAS to facilitate the ends of genocidal monotheisms in India, of which plot the promotion of PIOs was a part).

While native Hindu bhaktas, shamed by the scandal, retreated in silence, Global Hindu declaimed that Westerners at the Kumbh were very willing to stand up for their guru, but nobody had bothered to organize them and take advantage of Nityananda’s global following! His primary concern seemed to be to salvage the assets for the white bhaktas; he was contemptuous of ashram inmates who suffered nervous breakdowns due to the scandal.

Global Hindu warned that many gurus fear similar attacks against other gurus (well, those who know they have compromised themselves with bhaktas in India or abroad are afraid), and urged a ‘central Hindu mechanism to deal with these episodes along the lines of various church mechanisms that intervene when Christianity faces a scandal.’ In other words, frighten Hindus into conforming to Christian Canon Law and hierarchical systems, and control the system through the central node. The Hindu Dharma Acharya Sabha is being sought to be built up into precisely such an institution, with rootless agents telling us that HDAS deliberations are ‘binding on all Hindus.’ Excuse me, they are not, and never will be. All that Hindu dharma needs is a sharp end to the global career of the global sanyasis, or a complete delink between globetrotters and native bhaktas.

HDAS is currently frightened and wants to wash its hands off the Nityananda affair, but Global Hindu has already said HDAS should take over the ashram! But HDAS knows its limits in the current situation, and is now too much under the public scrutiny of some of us to dare walk that treacherous path.

Global Hindu concludes that ‘being a global guru is very demanding today, given that one has to represent a very old tradition authentically and yet in a manner that appeals to modern people. This is why Hindu leaders need a crash course on matters that are well beyond the traditional education in their own sampradayas (lineages).’

Global Hindu has damned himself with his crass ignorance – a guru is supposed to guide his flock and not repackage himself like a cinema formula for box office returns – we can see where that attitude has landed Nityananda. Gurus who are true to tradition and maintain the purity of personal conduct do not need modern marketing gimmicks to remain in ‘business’ – we can safely leave that to the economic and cultural evacuees who are successfully selling dharma abroad, and will make heaps of money, until some naked white man or woman decides to stake claim for a share in the pie!

Conclusion: Bharat in the punyabhumi

It should be obvious that the category of persons calling themselves Global Hindus pose a serious danger to Hindu dharma on Hindu bhumi; all Hindu gurus and sanyasis and lay citizens must be on guard against this group which willingly serves the political agenda of the white Christian nations.

Hindus in India need to understand that qualified Indians who over two generations, actively instigated by their parents, decided to use the professional education available in limited quantities in Nehruvian India to better their economic prospects by running away to the salubrious West, are no longer Indian in any sense of the term. Most have acquired the citizenship  of western nations, and during visits to this land, boast of their relief at being free of the cultural baggage associated with Hindu samskaras!

It was the emerging geo-political needs of the Anglo-Americans that made India vital for exerting pressure on Russia, China, and Central Asia, and hence it was sought to be co-opted into the Western sphere of influence. The elite was already pro-West (decades of Ford Foundation, etc), but now the Indian Diaspora in the United States was ‘encouraged’ to be ‘Hindu nationalist’, as the UK Diaspora was too secular.

With foresight, American Jewish women were planted as bhaktas to take over the ashrams of the globetrotting sanyasis, and the PIOs started descending on the ashrams of  Hindu gurus, professing to be most impressed with their social work or erudition!

An attempt was made to secure dual citizenship for this Diaspora (eg., Rahm Emanuel is an Israeli citizen; Saakashvili has an American passport, etc.) but this floundered as the prime beneficiaries of such a move would be the citizens of Pakistan and Bangladesh! Now, in the wake of the Mossad assassination of a Palestinian leader in Dubai using dual citizenship passports, and the fact that Sri Lanka’s troubles flow from the fact that Gen. Sarath Fonseka was allowed to take an American Green Card while serving as Army Chief, many former colonies will be re-looking the dual citizenship issue. The issue of close kin of political leaders living abroad as foreign citizens will also come up for wider discussion some day.

Indians who abandoned their bhumi for pure economic gains, gloating about leaving the license permit raj and corrupt quota regime at home, could not have suddenly turned religious-cultural unless their host countries permitted it. They would have realised this when rabid anti-Hindu scholars conducted a vicious campaign against American Hindus associated with fund-raising for RSS social activities in India. Another wake up call would have been the shabby experience in the California textbook case. Now Hindus (including our Global Hindu) have run away from the Texas textbook controversy; those associated with RSS once have long gone underground, or reinvented themselves as ‘objective’ critics of the Sangh Parivar!

We rest our case with the reiteration that Hindu dharma belongs to the Hindu bhumi and Indian Hindu people. The white Christian attempt to de-link dharma from the land is an idea whose time is gone; the full weight of globetrotting sanyasis (such as it may be) will not succeed in making foreign bhaktas or ex-Indian bhaktas the ‘authentic’ voice of native Hindu tradition. Globetrotting sanyasis would do well to read the writing on the wall and retreat to the safety of their Hindu havens, expelling possible mischief-making white bhaktas before they launch a full-scale war for ashram properties and assets. Those comfortable with white bhaktas should settle on those shores.

Finally, it will surely be asked whom am I to make these startling prescriptions. I derive my courage from the Vedas which are explicit – Dharma is that which is stated by one wise man (this is gender neutral, by the way), not that which is voted by an assembly of fools.

Let the Hindu Dharma Acharya Sabha not be an assembly of fools; let it abandon its faux international (read anti-national) agenda.

» Sandhya Jain is the Editor of Vijayvaani.

Is Nithy impotent?

Earlier Posts

 

11 Responses

  1. Deccan Chronicle, Chennai, 21 April 2010
    ‘Tantrik’ Nithyananda ran sex racket in US
    by Ala Chauhan in Bangalore

    Controversial godman Nithyananda Swami was reportedly running a sex racket from his ashrams in Kengeri and the US with his select women devotees with whom he signed a non-disclosure agreement.

    “He lured these women, most of who were divorcees, under the guise of tantra and promised that they would inherit his divine powers if they had a physical relationship with him,” charged an official source.

    These and more damaging statements are part of the alleged testimonies of some of Nithyananda’s devotees before the Criminal Investigation Department (CID), which on Tuesday issued a look-out notice for the controversial godman.

    The CID has sent teams across the country to track him, Tamil actress Ranjitha, who was in the controversial videotape with him and his close aide Vidya Vishwanathan alias Gopika, who knew everything about his sexcapades. The department
    has even alerted the airports should Nithyananda try to leave the country.

    The CID is probing the criminal charges against the godman and has so far examined over 120 witnesses including his devotees, some of who parted ways with him for various reasons. In their testimony some devotees allegedly told the CID officials that swami did not even spare young men in his ashram and lured them into having sex with him with false promises of divinity and spiritual powers.

    During the investigation, the CID seized several documents from the Dhyanapeetam ashram. They also learnt that he so impressed his devotees with his ‘powers’.

    Like

  2. Times of India, Chennai, 3 April 2010
    Godman expose a teamwork: Ex-disciple

    Chennai: Lenin Karuppan alias Nithya Dharmananda, the man behind the leaking of the Swami Nithyananda’s scandalous video, says that he had a group of people working with him in the Bangalore ashram to expose the “wrongdoings” of the godman. Talking to Times Of India, Lenin said that they had used a sophisticated motion sensor camera to shoot the video and it was not fixed inside the room by him.

    “I do not want to reveal the names (of others involved) or how we fixed it there. However, I have been helped by a group in making this video so that I could expose the real face of Nithyananda, whom thousands worship as god. I have got more evidence against him,” Lenin said.

    Lenin said he decided to expose Nithyananda after two ashram inmates told him that the swami had sexually exploited them. “A man and a woman shared their story with me and I was shocked. This was three months before we recorded the video. Then we conducted an investigation and found many others had fallen victims,” Lenin said.

    He said he was now trying to get the two victims, one of whom is still in the ashram, to lodge a formal complaint against Nithyananda.

    For the first time after the leak of the scandalous video, which showed Nithyananda and a Tamil actress, Lenin was questioned by the Karnataka police on Thursday. “They interrogated me for seven hours yesterday( on Thursday). I have given them all the proof I had. Apart from the original CD, I have also given them an audio recording of a phone call made to me by Nithyananda, who called me to arrive at a compromise and later threatened me,” Lenin said. When asked about tarnishing the image of an actress, Lenin said that he too felt sorry for her. “But I had to expose Nithyananda for larger public good,” he said.

    The Chennai city police had registered two cases against Nithyananda following complaints lodged by Lenin and also by a group of advocates. He has been booked under various sections of IPC relating to deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings, rape, unnatural sex, cheating, criminal intimidation and criminal conspiracy.

    However, both these cases have been transferred to the Bangalore police. Nithyananda’s whereabouts are still not known though he has said he wants to live in ‘spiritual seclusion’ after stepping down from his official positions at the Nithyananda Dhyanapeedam.

    Like

  3. Rajesh Talwar in Canada posted this comment on Débutante Dharma-Gurus: Violating a civilisational patent – at http://www.vijayvaani.com/FrmPublicDisplayArticle.aspx?id=1144

    Finally Maharishi Om’s demand that Nityananda should apologise to Hindus and also give up his sanyasi clothes supports the stand of these two feisty ladies who have stood firm even when they have been abused on many email groups by 2 or 3 men. Ms. Jain, I live in Canada and I know Nityananda has a large following here. There is a lot of anger and sadness here. But one thing struck me as being queer. Why has there been no coherent defence of this Nityananda from India? I have read several postings on emails from these 3 or 4 men who have abused you and Radha Rajan. From what I could make of them, one is a retired IAS gasbag, one of them is a silly scholar who has only been reposting letters from one group to another, the third was from some slimy swamy something-or-the-other who was circulating mail which are generally foolish and make no sensible arguments he is a disgrace to the name swami for circulating cheap gossip) and the fourth was from a man who quoted some tamil proverbs with a covert sexual meaning. If this is the standard of intellectual discussions from men in India, I am glad I dont live there anymore. And they say in India we worship women. I feel sorry that you ladies are being abused but you know what, you hang in there and continue with your intellectual war. You ladies are doing simply great. Would love to meet you both the next time I am in India. Good luck ladies. If the men are morons, arent there women to speak up for you? – Rajesh Talwar

    Like

  4. Nithy has made a grave mistake and brought all Hindu Dharma representatives into disgrace. He has an obligation to change his ways and apologize for abusing the trust of his devotees. In another age Naga sadhus would have dealt with him in a very severe manner: they would have stripped him of his kavi cloth and rudraksha mala and given him jal samadhi in the Ganga.

    We don’t advocate jal samadhi today, but Nithy should remove his kavi cloth, shave his head, take a Ganga bath, and humbly apologize to all the people he has cheated.

    There is no other way. And if he is really a man of character, he will do these simple ritual actions to indicate a change of heart and mitigate the great harm he has done to Hindu Dharma.

    Like

  5. PRESS RELEASE

    Appeal to Nithyananda by Maharishi Om

    Founder of the Rejuvenation Yoga Institute of America and YogaUSA.com, an institution that has over 200,000 followers learning Vedic knowledge.

    1 April 2010

    Contact:
    tel: ++1.630.699.4038
    w: http://www.yogausa.com
    e: maharishi.om@gmail.com

    Om Namah Shivaya,

    This is a special appeal to Nithyananda. All of you know him very well. Nithyananda, please say sorry to all devotees and say sorry to all sanyasis (monks) because you are bringing a bad name to sanyasis (monks) and also a bad name for Hinduism.

    Your statements, they are very, very confusing. One place you are saying that you are doing an experiment … and you are in samadhi (trance). But, whatever you are experimenting in samadhi (trance) that is not an act of a sanyasi (monk). This is very, very bad.

    In another statement, you are saying that “I did nothing wrong; nothing illegal, at all. And, I have not done anything against the law.” What is legal and illegal for a sanyasi (monk)? Can you please explain?

    In another statement, you are saying that the video was morphed, manipulated, and misrepresented – (of) your personal life. What was morphed? And, what was manipulated? Can you please explain?

    In another interview, you are saying that she (Ranjitha) was your true devotee. She is and she will be your devotee. And, she will remain your devotee. And, she was volunteering, serving, and taking care of you when you were sick.

    We devotees don’t understand these statements at all. (You are) very confused. These statements are confusing and creating frustration in devotees’ hearts. (Your statements are) contradicting (to) each other; nobody knows which one is true and which one is real. What it appears to the general public that the statements are made up, and the truth is not being revealed. Why don’t (you) say sorry? And, say, sorry, again and again? And, say, “I made a mistake, and I cannot live up to the standard of a real sanyasi (monk)?” And, ask for forgiveness? And take corrective measures?

    We, sanyasis (monks) are in great pain and sorrow. With your actions, we request to you, (to) please say sorry to (the) public and correct yourself. You, Nithyananda, need to leave this kavi (holy saffron) cloth immediately.

    We request to the public to keep a close watch on people who misguide and who mislead you. Remember the statement from Kabirdas:

    Guru kijiye jaan ke, paani pijiye chhan ke.

    That means: Understand your guru before you accept him, and always filter the water before you drink it.

    What is the meaning of sanyasi (monk)? Who is a sanyasi and a true guru? Sanyasa means renunciation and detachment from worldly affairs. Sanyasa means tyaga (unconditional detached love), not raga (lust) or anuraaga (worldly love). Sanyasa means love, not lust at all. Swami means the one who has mastered over sensual pleasures. But, it is clearly coming out from your (Nithyananda’s) statements that you are not following the path of dharma (righteousness). Please, admit your mistake and say sorry. Guru means true guide, like a mother.

    I again humbly appeal to the devotees who are following the path of dharma (righteousness) and they are in pain, please remain calm in this difficult time, have faith in God and continue your spiritual journey.

    Om Shanti Shanti Shanti Om (Peace within, Peace throughout, Peace Everywhere)

    Like

  6. […] Debutante Dharma-Gurus: Violating a civilizational patent – Sandhya Jain – https://bharatabharati.wordpress.com/2010/03/21/debutante-dharma-gurus-violating-a-civilisational-pat… […]

    Like

  7. Reposting from someone…

    Sandhya Jain is outright wrong that Hinduism is limited to India and that she has monopoly over interpreting it. The whole world is made of the same panchabhootas. Everything in the world is the manifestation of the same one and only Brahman. Vedanta’s truths are not geographically limited. But she turns Vedas into a racist theory. The Arya in Vedas did not refer to any race but to a quality which all humans can achieve. Equating arya as race is what European racists did and she has unfortunately become colonized. Her understanding of jana, gotra, etc. is flawed, and she lacks access to the Sanskrit originals.

    There is too much guilt by association in her thinking. GFCH, Swami Dayananda Saraswati, Hindu Acharya Sabha, Hindu American Foundation, WAVES, etc. are all declared guilty (in this and prior articles by her and her collaborator Radha Rajan) just because they are outside India. She does not offer specifics of what they have done to deserve this. Nor does she prove why mere association with these entities must necessarily disqualify anyone to be credible as a Hindu. This violates the dharma’s criteria of making judgment in a fair and balanced manner. It is meant to suck in gullible people.

    She is promoting a dangerous form of untouchability in which all those she does not agree with can be condemned without due process, merely by showing their association with entities on her black list. This is how Nazis operated, and how radical fundamentalists function by branding those to be targeted. Does she have the right to turn Hinduism into such hate based radicalism?

    She was raised in English medium education and lived in Delhi’s cocktail party circuit (which she accuses others of but exempts herself.) She lived a privileged childhood with her father who worked as an English language scribe in Times of India all his life. Should that also taint her own family as mleccha by association? Sandhya Jain lived off of NRIs sponsoring her foreign trips for years. When they stopped funding her, she started to lash out against all NRIs. This is plain jealousy and a form of blackmail. Smt. Jain presumably wears a bra, something that emerged from mleccha culture, not her narrowminded idea of Bharat. She uses mobile phone, internet, airlines and many western originated things. She is frequently found hobnobbing in Delhi’s five star westernized settings. Surely she does not apply her own logic and disqualify herself as a Hindu?

    Is she against globalization of India and its culture? This is a complex issue that seems to be well beyond her intellectual capacity. If she advocates that true Hindus are those who live only within India, then does she also wish to expel all foreigners now living in India in various jobs and capacities in order to keep India “pure” according to her criteria? If so, how would that differ from a policy of isolationism under the garb of “true Hinduism”?

    By her logic, those who “globetrot” and are hence unqualified to speak about dharma include: Dalai Lama, Sri Sri Ravishankar, Baba Ramdev, Mata Amritanandmayi Devi, Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, Swami Vivekananda, Sri Aurobindo, Mahatma Gandhi, and just about everyone we respect. What rubbish! Is Buddhism voided as dharma just because it spread across Asia as India’s most successful export ever?

    According to Jain’s reasoning, all “other countries” into which she clubs everything outside India, harbor only anti-Hindu people. By the same token, she presumes that being based in India gives her legitimacy without any need for her to do purushartha or any kind. We would like to know what gives her adhikar to be so arrogant as if she has a monopoly on Hinduism.

    Sandhya Jain is implying that merely by virtue of being in India one becomes Aryan/noble. What about Lakshar, the Mumbai crime mob, and the recent prostitution ring leader busted in Delhi who was very much a bhumiputra dressed in saffron clothes? So the Maoists and Nagaland Christian terror supporters and Khalistanis are all great Hindus, just because they are physically inside Bharat.

    The following is an unsubstantiated charge for which she is unable to cite any specifics. Nobody familiar with Malhotra’s works will understand heads or tails of what is going on in her head when she writes: “Some years ago, ‘guided’ by white superiors, he had peddled a blueprint for cutting and chopping the vast Hindu spiritual universe into a corporate hierarchy with a single point of control that would be easier to ‘manage.’ By whom, he did not say, but it didn’t need Einstein to figure that out.” In fact, on the contrary, more than most Indians Malhotra has studied and critiqued white culture and its attempts to control. When Malhotra posted his articles on whiteness, Sandhya Jain was among those who felt uneasy because of her own whiteness complex.

    Jain misquotes Malhotra on links between Hinduism and tantra. She has not read his article objectively. She also makes a snide remark as follows: “Global Hindu is pleased that Tantra is being subjected to the clinical experimentation of psychologists and other scientists examining latent human energies and potentials. This is surely something likely to be misused in places like Guantanamo Bay; do recall that the US was the foremost buyer of Nazi concentration camp medical literature! ” But by this logic, ALL SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENTS CAN BE SEEN AS SOME SINISTER CONSPIRACY LIKE GUANTANAMO BAY AND NAZISM. She fails to explain what is specific about tantra experiments that have this sinister quality.

    Sandhya Jain writes, “The Shiva Sutras are valid for Shiva bhaktas, and that is it. The 112 spiritual enlightenment techniques taught therein, with 6 delineating sexual contact between male yogi and female yogini, are for seekers on that path.” But that is exactly the position of Swami Nithyananda. He explicitly said that he was not offering tantra to the general public and that he had a few such contracts only.

    She is also jealous that Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, a Global Guru, did not grant her any interview but spoke to Malhotra.

    Ironically, Sandhya Jain uses English language exclusively, and has never made a paisa writing in any other language. So she should reject her own works as tainted with mleccha.

    Like

  8. By the way, who has annointed Ms Jain to speak on the behalf of ALL Hindus even in India? I am a Hindu from India – still an Indian – who is working abroad and I have nothing to be ashamed of that fact. And, I do not need any guidance, lease aside permission, from the likes of Ms Sandhya Jain, to call myself Hindu. With such defenders, Hindus do NOT need enemies. But then, what can one say about the sanity, or otherwise, of someone who wrote Communist occupation and destruction of Tibet was an act of guardianship from the Christian West!

    Like

  9. There is a very interesting discussion going on at Sandhya Jain’s site Vijayvaani. Go and see it at
    http://www.vijayvaani.com/FrmPublicDisplayArticle.aspx?id=1144

    Like

  10. he he he… it was very very funny… Indeed.

    Like

  11. I agree entirely with the points and specific demands Sandhya Jain is making in this article. Finally somebody is telling the truth and asking some serious questions (as did RR before her at https://bharatabharati.wordpress.com/2010/03/05/nityananda-videos-a-testing-time-for-hindus-radha-rajan/ ).

    Rajiv Malhotra’s explanation for his involvement in this sordid affair is very weak and not at all convincing. He appears to be another dissembler and casuist in true Western Jesuitical tradition (see http://medhajournal.com/geopolitics-guru/973-why-swami-nithyananda-must-resign-now.html?showall=1 ). He has made a fool of himself as has his spokesman Swamijyoti of the Vivekajyoti Blog, and he is trying to cover his bottom with the bits of rag he might find here and there so that he can escape back to the safety of “civilized” Princeton . He is an American fixer with American money and an American point of view, and has little or no in-depth understanding of Hindu Dharma and its intrinsic and indissoluble relationship to Hindustan. We don’t need anything he has to offer, thank you.

    Malhotra’s understanding of Tantra also needs revision. All popular Hindu religious practice today is tantric in that it employs mantras, yantras, and images. This has nothing to do with sex. Sexual techniques are there in a small part of the Tantra and they have been exaggerated and taken out of context and sensationalized by Westerners and those Hindus who slavishly follow everything Westerners say or do. But tantra is and has never been for sadhus wearing kavi cloth. It was a practice employed by a very few under the strict guidance of a guru by yogis who were either married persons or otherwise had a legitimate relationship with their partners. Sanyasis are not to practice these obscure forms of yoga and, indeed, sanyasis are a distinct class different from yogis. So Tantra cannot be used to justify or excuse Nithya’s intimate relationships with women. Please lets not hear any more of this humbug and hooey from the learned American from Princeton who does not seem to know the difference between a sanyasi and a yogi, or tantra and sex.

    His observation about the sky clad Nagas at the Kumbh is ignorant and foolish. Is he aware that the on initiation the Naga’s penis is “broken” and the Naga can not have an erection even if he wished to?

    Nithya must defrocked and the relevant kriya performed to join him back into a family. This was done with another Nithya of Ganeshpuri, a disciple of Muktananda) when it was discovered that he was having sexual relations with women in the ashram. This Nithya so far has shown no remorse even though he has brought shame and disgrace on Hindu Dharma and has no more the right to wear the kavi cloth. As his sponsor, Swami Dayanandaji has an obligation to the Hindu community to see that Nithya’s titles and sacred costume are taken away from him. Swami Dayanandaji also has an obligation to distant Nithya and his misdeeds from the rest of the sadhu fraternity – we are all being tarred with the same brush because of the mistakes of one randy young man.

    Nithya’s properties can be returned to their original owners – after all he has abused their trust and cheated them. There is no reason why he should retain these properties when they were not put to the use the devotee who gifted them intended. And nobody else has a right to them including the American interloper and his various associations.

    And lastly, Nithya if he has any character at all must admit his mistake and ask forgiveness of the many people he has deceived. He will be forgiven – but how can we forgive an offender who does not admit his wrong doing and does not make an effort to change his lifestyle and licentious ways?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: