India and the Corona Catastrophe – Sandhya Jain

PM Modi in video conference with state chief ministers.

Sandhya Jain is the editor of Vijayvaani.Sadly, India is looking at an extension of the three-week lockdown imposed on March 25 because thousands gathered at Tablighi Jamaat Markaz in Delhi to attend a meeting, defying prohibitory orders. – Sandhya Jain

Some contours of the post-Coronavirus world are clearly visible. The nation-state has regained legitimacy; the case for free flow of refugees/immigrants across a borderless world has collapsed; and governments are facing the critical test of whether they can rally their people behind them to overcome the disease. India has performed remarkably well so far, though critics may carp that steps taken in February and March could have been taken earlier. Perhaps, or as Maurice Maeterlinck mused: “It is easy for those who are wise after the event to see what ought to have been done when time has brought full knowledge of what was really taking place” (Wisdom and Destiny).

Doomsday accounts of Cassandras in reputed (sic) Western media and their acolytes in India have proved demonstrably false. India’s vibrant democracy and cultural generosity have created the synergy needed to face the challenges posed by COVID-19. Immediately after lockdown was announced, civil society across India rose as one to daily feed millions in every city, without discrimination; virtually every mandir, matham, gurdwara is at work. Five star hotels, dharamsalas, guest houses, are providing quality accommodation for overworked medical staff. Even migrant labour that were misguided to leave Delhi, or panicked and left other cities, have been provided for by citizens along the route.

Indian Railways imaginatively converted unused bogeys into quarantine facilities. Research labs, companies, and young engineers are innovating ventilators, splitters for ventilators, fumigation chambers, protective gear for medical staff, smart stethoscopes, sanitizer trunks. Households are making and distributing masks to the needy.

In Pakistan, NGOs are denying food and rations to poor Hindus and Christians suffering from coronavirus, an act that has angered even their Muslim neighbours. Long suffering Balochistan complains of neglect; medical staff lack Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), and quarantine facilities are disgraceful. The silence of the hyperactive international media is deafening.

What makes India’s response unique is the Union Cabinet’s decision to reduce salary, allowances and pensions of all Members of Parliament by a whopping 30 per cent, for one year, with effect from April 1, 2020. The President, Vice President, and Governors voluntarily took a similar pay cut as social responsibility. The MP Local Area Development Scheme (MPLADS) has been suspended for two years (2020-21 and 2021-22); all money saved will go to the Consolidated Fund of India. This scale of personal sacrifice is unmatched in the world so far; even children have been inspired to give their savings (for bicycle, birthday) to feed the needy.

Most noteworthy is the speed with which India evacuated its stranded citizens, first from Wuhan (epicenter of the outbreak) and then from other cities: Milan and Rome; Tehran; Manila, Singapore. Of the 890 persons evacuated from COVID-19 affected countries, 48 hailed from The Maldives, Myanmar, Bangladesh, China, US, Israel, Madagascar, Sri Lanka, Nepal, South Africa and Peru, and were evacuated at the request of their governments. Special efforts were made to rescue 124 persons quarantined on board the Diamond Princess cruise ship off the Japanese port of Yokohama, including five nationals from Sri Lanka, Nepal, South Africa and Peru. India did offer to rescue Pakistani students from Wuhan, but Islamabad rebuffed the offer; seven Maldivians were evacuated.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi held a video conference with leaders of South Asian nations and launched a fund, with an initial contribution of $10 million, to check the spread of the pandemic in the region. India also responded to requests for emergency medical equipment from Bhutan and the Maldives. India participated in the G-20 video conference to discuss containment strategies and the economic impact of the outbreak, especially unemployment.

India has already taken the lead in the struggle to develop a vaccine, and on April 11, the Department of Science and Technology agreed to fund Seagull BioSolutions Pvt. Ltd. to develop Active Virosome Vaccine and Immunodiagnostic kits for COVID-19. As the largest manufacturer of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), currently considered a life-saving drug for fighting coronavirus, India is supplying thirty countries, including the United States, and ramping up production for future needs. However, the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) used to manufacture HCQ comes from China, which continued supplies throughout the crisis, but in coming days, India will have to revisit its domestic manufacturing strategy.

The anti-tuberculosis BCG vaccine is emerging as another potential cure. India’s low death rate is said to be due to its universal immunization schedule that includes BCG, and a fair amount of population immunity to malaria. An ongoing research at the New York Institute of Technology shows that countries that discontinued the BCG vaccine (United States, Italy, Germany, Spain, France, Iran and the U.K.) have proved very vulnerable to COVID-19.

Comparisons are undesirable at this apocalyptic moment in human history, but given the uncalled for attacks on India from some responsible quarters, some points are in order. India saw its first case of coronavirus in the last week of January, around the same time as Europe and the United States. After initially claiming the disease would go away on its own, US President Donald Trump said on March 30 that administration estimates show that Covid-19 could kill 100,000 to 200,000 people in America, and such a toll would indicate that his administration has “done a very good job”. Imagine an Indian leader saying such a death toll is acceptable, and surviving. At the time of writing, the world had 1,853,327 cases and 114,250 deaths; India had 9,152 cases and 308 mortalities.

The pandemic has inflicted deep pain, disrupting incomes of those dependent on daily wages, creating havoc with small businesses and manufacturing units, and triggering mass unemployment. Sadly, India is looking at an extension of the three-week lockdown imposed on March 25 because thousands gathered at Tablighi Jamaat Markaz in Nizamuddin, Delhi, including 280 from Malaysia, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and Kyrgyzstan, to attend a meeting on March 13, defying prohibitory orders.

Many left and spread the disease to other States and countries. Police escorted some to the airport after the March 22 Janata Curfew, but they returned surreptitiously; the authorities were called only on March 30 after one person died. Thereafter, the behaviour of many in hospital has been unmentionable. Yet Indian medical staff have served them with exemplary dedication and moral fortitude; all talk of the “sectoral targetting of a particular community” is invidious and deserves outright condemnation. – Vijayvaani, 14 april 2020

Sandhya Jain is an author, senior journalist and columnist for The Pioneer in New Delhi. 

Coronasura being prepared for burning in Mumbai.


 

2 Responses

  1. Biological Warfare

    What we are witnessing now is an extraordinary demonstration of the effectiveness of bio warfare. It does not matter how this particular episode originated because the consequences are an unprecedented illustration of how nations can easily be brought to their knees in weeks. This will not go unnoticed by terrorist organisations and many of them will deploy skills to acquire a capacity to wage similar bio warfare. It is also noteworthy that such bio warfare is extremely easy to wage if the lethal viruses can be obtained. A few people entering the target country and travelling around it can cause utter havoc within weeks. The country’s economy and society can be disabled and its ability to resist severely compromised. Such a modus vivendi of assault will also allow deniability. An indirect threat to conduct bio warfare can be issued though unrelated third parties and used as a discreet powerful bargaining chip.

    India needs to assemble a team to study the manifold implications of a similar or even worse episode by reviewing the current experience and by analysing data generated by it. I am sure multiple scenarios can be postulated and the required responses in such a dire eventuality.

    However, such a potential bio warfare threat can equally be encountered by many other countries, including Islamic regimes that face domestic dissent as well as all major powers around the world. What they need to collectively agree is that they will treat a threat to any one country of bio warfare as an attack on all of them. And the need to respond collectively to provide aid to the impacted country. An agreement is also imperative to treat the likely national origin of the bio warfare assault as a country that is engaging in war and meriting immediate military sanction. They must also collectively refuse to make any concessions to the terrorists and indeed initiate changes on the ground that completely repudiate the demands made, e.g. the mass transfer of populations. Existing international treaties on bio warfare need to be revisited as a matter of urgency and strengthened, for example, by insisting on compulsory international surveillance. Those countries which refuse should be expelled from international organisations and their nationals denied all travel. Existing international treaties also provide a basis for specific additional preemptive measures, including the threat of decisive military action, to be undertaken in order to combat this truly extraordinary threat to global welfare.

    Like

Comments are closed.

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: