Anti-Christian Acts: Myth and Reality – Vivek Gumaste

VG Icon“When the BJP first came to power in the late 1990s we heard of anti-Christian incidents perpetrated by members of the Sangh Parivar, the majority of which proved to be blatant falsehoods. We need to recall those events to give a reality check to a similar campaign of unsubstantiated calumny that is raising its head again to discredit the BJP government.” – Vivek Gumaste.

Cardinal Baselios CleemisIt stands out as a master-stroke of ideological gamesmanship; a Machiavellian exercise par excellence; a deceptive, cruel phantasma specifically conjured up to mislead the public, hijack the moral discourse in the nation and embarrass the government on the international front.

It is a ditto replay — the same suffocating hysteria, the same unsubstantiated hype and the same haste to condemnation.

When the Bharatiya Janata Party first came to power in the late 1990s we heard of anti-Christian incidents allegedly perpetrated by members of the Sangh Parivar, the majority of which proved to be blatant falsehoods deliberately blown out of proportion and distorted to gain political and religious mileage.

We need to recall those events to give a reality check to a similar campaign of unsubstantiated calumny (church attacks in Delhi) that is raising its head again to discredit the current BJP government.

Rewind to 1998 to review a much publicised incident involving the rape of four Christian nuns in Jhabua, Madhya Pradesh. Even before any details of this crime were available, major newspapers had conducted a trial, established the criminal guilt of Hindu organisations, and communicated this message to the country and the world at large by splashing this news across their front pages — a clear case of the press playing the part of accuser, judge and jury rolled into one.

Francois GautierIt was left to Francois Gautier, the correspondent in South Asia for Le Figaro, France’s largest-circulated newspaper, who went to Jhabua to unearth the truth. This is what he wrote in the Hindustan Times (February 1, 1999):

“This massive outcry on the ‘atrocities against the minorities’ raises also doubts about the quality and integrity of Indian journalism. Take, for instance, the rape of the four nuns in Jhabua. Today the Indian press (and the foreign correspondents — witness Tony Clifton’s piece in the last issue of Newsweek) are still reporting that it was a ‘religious’ rape.

“Yet I went to Jhabua and met the four adorable nuns, who themselves admitted, along with their Bishop George Anatil, that it had nothing to do with religion. It was the doing of a gang of Bhil tribals, known to perpetrate this kind of hateful acts on their own women.

“Yet today, the Indian press, the Christian hierarchy and the politicians continue to include the Jhabua rape in the list of atrocities against Christians.”

A few days later, the home minister released a list of the criminals, a list forwarded to him by the Congress government (whose leader happens to be Christian) of Madhya Pradesh at that time: 12 of the accused were Christians!

Christian groups initially questioned this finding, but when confronted with irrefutable proof chose to ignore it. And the newspapers?

Deendar AnjumanYes, they reported it in some hidden corner of their papers following what has become an accepted strategy for some: Create hype, discredit your adversaries and finally when the truth comes out, report it in small print.

Other similar incidents confirm my view-point. In 2000, a series of bomb blasts occurred in churches across Karnataka, Andhra and Goa. Again, without evidence Hindu groups were promptly indicted for these attacks. Eventually, it turned out to be the handiwork of a Muslim organisation, Deendar Anjuman with Pakistani links.

The group was caught red-handed with Om symbols in their possession meant to frame Hindu groups (Centre to consider banning Deendar Anjuman).

Despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary and glaring proof of a frame-up, our media continued to blame Hindu groups invoking a bizarre logic: “But it is clear that such organisations have become active in an environment of intolerance and bigotry that the Hindu Right is squarely responsible for creating” (Frontline, July 22, 2000).

St Sebastian's Church, DelhiAnother series of church attacks in Karnataka in 2008 were investigated by the Justice B. K. Somasekara Commission of Inquiry which categorically stated: “There is no basis to the apprehension of Christian petitioners that politicians, the BJP, mainstream Sangh Parivar and the state government are directly or indirectly involved in the attacks” (Clean chit for BJP, Parivar).

While not denying the occurrence of some isolated anti-Christian hate attacks, an objective assessment indicates that the broader anti-Christian narrative was wilfully orchestrated with an ulterior motive in mind.

With this past scenario as the backdrop, let us focus on the current spate of church attacks. In a hard-hitting article, Rupa Subramanya (Crying Wolf: Narrative of ‘Delhi church attacks’ Flies in the Face of Facts) after examining each individual ‘incident in detail and taking into account the facts available concludes: “There’s no evidence whatever that these six incidents in Dilshad Garden, Jasola, Rohini, Vikaspuri, Vasant Kunj and Vasant Vihar are related or part of a pattern of attacks on minority institutions.”

She rightfully avers: “It’s also necessary to keep the nature and quantum of these incidents in the proper perspective. Crucially, it’s not just churches that are periodically vandalised alone, according to the Delhi police, 206 temples, 30 gurdwaras and three churches and 14 mosques were burgled in 2014.”

Finally, she poses the million dollar question: “Why exactly are church leaders and their friends in the media so eager to establish there’s a communal angle to these recent incidents when the facts say the opposite? What are they hoping to gain? It’s irresponsible and downright dangerous if they promote their agenda in the face of the facts.”

George Alencherry, Kuriakose Bharanikulangara & Narendra ModiThe rights of every Indian, regardless of her/his religious denomination, must be safeguarded. Genuine atrocities must be brought to the fore and addressed suitably to ensure a climate devoid of fear for that is what our country and our age-old tradition is about.

But any campaign must be backed by the strength of truth and honesty. It cannot be a ploy to gain ideological advantage or a camouflage to pursue illicit conversions unhindered. We need to look through these old shenanigans. – Rediff, 25 February 2015

» Vivek Gumaste lives in New York City and writes for the Hindustan Times and

2 Responses

  1. Earlier when such Church attacks incidents happened my post on various places read loke this…
    “It seems there is systematic conspiracy going on to blame BJP”
    Proving right.


  2. Narendra Modi denounces communalism, says his govt stands for all – Liz Mathew – The Indian Express – New Delhi – February 27, 2015

    Breaking his silence on the Land Act and communalism, Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday denounced communalism saying that his government’s religion is ‘India First’ and its Holy Book is the Indian Constitution even as he promised that his government would make changes in the Land Bill if it has anything against farmers.

    “My government’s only religion is ‘India first’, my government’s only religious book is ‘Indian Constitution’, our only devotion is ‘Bharat Bhakti’ and our only prayer is ‘welfare of all’,” he said in Lok Sabha while replying to a debate on President’s Address.

    Declaring that as the Prime Minister of the country, it was his “responsibility” not to allow “anaap shanap (ridiculous) comments in the name of religion, Modi, who has been criticised for his silence on the increased incidents of attacks against minority Christians and the controversial remarks from some of his party leaders, said: “Nobody has the right to discriminate on the basis of religion… No one has the right to take law into his hands.”

    Earlier this month, at an event organized by Catholics in Delhi, Modi had said, “No religious group can incite violence… my government will ensure there is complete freedom of faith.”

    In the Lok Sabha, replying to the debate on the motion of thanks to the presidential address, Modi said: “Communalism for political reasons has destroyed the country. Hearts have been broken… we want all religions to prosper.

    “This nation full of diversity. We are for unity in diversity, not disunity. All religions should flourish. It is the uniqueness of India because of its Constitution,” he said.

    The PM also said the government is ready to make changes in the controversial Land Act, against which the Opposition and rights activists have been protesting saying it is anti-farmer. “If the Bill has anything against farmers, we are ready to change it,” Modi said.

    Seeking the opposition’s cooperation for taking it forward, he said: “If despite all the benefits that the new reforms will bring, you feel there is any provision that is anti-farmer, I am willing to make changes to the proposal. Let us work together.”

    He, however, took a dig at the Opposition Congress. “If your law was so good, why was the Congress wiped out in a series of elections?,” he asked

    The government, under fire from the opposition and the rights groups which have alleged that the Bill in its present form would hurt the farmers’ interests, was reluctant to make any changes to the Act saying that tougher clauses would be a hurdle for the industries and it would hamper the investment atmosphere.

    However, the party does not want the government to have a pro-corporate and anti farmer image, especially as the BJP is preparing for key elections in Bihar later this year. Party president Amit Shah has appointed an eight member committee to get the farmers’ view on the bill. The farmer leaders of the BJP have already conveyed their anguish over the certain clauses in the new act.

    The Land act, brought as an ordinance on December 31, has amended the existing law passed by the UPA government in 2013. In the new version, the government has taken away the need of taking consent of the land owners and carrying out social economic assessment (SIA) for acquiring land under certain categories. Three of its allies, Shiv Sena, Shormani Akali Dal and LJP also have raised opposition to these clauses in the act.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: