Madurai Aadheenam: Hindus outraged at Nithy’s appointment as pontiff – Media Reports

Nithyananda's coronation in Madurai

Hindus outfits will approach court as protest against Nithyananda’s appointment as mutt head grows – B. Sivakumar

The protests against the anointment of controversial godman Nithyananda as head of the Madurai Adheenam, a Shaivaite mutt, gained momentum on Monday with Hindu outfits threatening to approach the court for a solution. Several Hindu outfits and other mutts across the state are planning a joint campaign. The 1,500-year-old adheenam has more than 1,000 acres of land and other properties under its control.

Defending the appointment, the present pontiff of the mutt, Arunagirinatha Desikar, said on Sunday that “a divine voice” had prompted him to name Nithyananda, who was caught in a sleaze tape controversy two years ago, as his successor. The Hindu Makkal Katchi is planning to bring together like-minded groups and heads of other adheenams on May 10 in Madurai for a meeting. The Hindu leaders will also address a public meeting the same day.

“We are planning to move vacation bench of the Madras high court against the appointment, which is against all traditional procedures. Appointing a controversial person as head of the Madurai Adheenam is a disgrace to all other adheenams,” said Arjun Sampath, general secretary of the Hindu Makkal Katchi, a breakaway group of the Hindu Munanni.

There are around 18 adheenams across the state, many of which control Shiva temples. Though the state-run Hindu religious and charitable endowments (HR&CE) department is the custodian of these temples, the heads of mutts are the traditional trustees and take care of the day-to-day administration and rituals.

“A big chunk of the income from these temples, including hundi collections, also goes to the adheenams,” said Tamil research scholar T M Selvaganapathy. “Their main activities include administration of temples under their control, managing schools and colleges run by the mutts and publishing religious books and periodicals.”

The Madurai mutt is the oldest among the adheenams. Contrary to popular belief, Shaivaite saint Thirugnana Sambandar (8th century) did not establish this adheenam, said temple research scholar Ooran Adigal. “Sambandar was invited for a debate against Jainism and he won the debate. He stayed on at the mutt and it came to be called Sambandar Adheenam,” he said.

The major problem faced by many adheenams is finding appropriate successors. “Earlier, there used to be many tambirans (junior pontiffs) in each adheenam. But now, not many are ready to become a pontiff, renouncing worldly pleasures. That is the reason why the present Madurai pontiff has chosen a controversial person to head the organization. But the proper procedure is to train juniors and hand over charge to them when the pontiff is not able to carry out his duties due to ill-health or other reasons,” said Ooran Adigal.

While the state government does not have full control over the mutts, they have to submit audited accounts to the HR&CE commissioner every year. “Under the HR&CE Act, the state gets a share of the temple incomes and oversees administration. We cannot interfere in the appointment of heads of these adheenams as they are governed by their own rules and regulations,” said a senior state official. – Times of India, Chennai, 1 May 2012

Hindus protest the appointment of Nithy as Madurai Aadheenam pontiff.
Hindus protest against Nithy’s appointment

Even as Hindu outfits and religious leaders expressed dismay at his decision, the Madurai Aadheenam head reiterated on Sunday controversial self-styled godman Nityananda was his successor to be the 293rd pontiff of the influential Saivite mutt.

Police had a tough time controlling protesters who tried to enter the mutt where Nityananda was introduced to the media.

Hindu Makkal Katchi leader Arjun Sampath said it was shocking the Aadheenam head had chosen to ignore strong sentiments of Saiva Hindus and crowned Nityananda, who faced criminal cases.

“We are not sure if the Aadheenam followed tradition. We want a personal audience with the mutt head. We fear he is a prisoner of circumstances.”

Mr Sampath said Saivite Thirugnana Sambandar, who founded the mutt 1,600 years ago, wore rudraksha, but the Aadheenam head and Nityananda wore gold.

Nityananda hit the headlines in March 2010 after TV channels showed his sleazy video with an actress. He was arrested a month later in Himachal. He claimed the video was fake, but police insisted they had evidence. – Deccan Chronicle, Chennai, 30 April 2012

All Shaivite Mutts express displeasure at Nithy’s appointment

Hindu religious outfits and followers of Saivism opposed the appointment of self-styled godman Nityananda as the 293rd pontiff of Madurai Aadheenam, an ancient Saivite mutt in the country, even as an unfazed aadheenam, Arunagirinatha Sri Gnanasambanda Desika Paramacharya Swamigal, enthroned him as his ‘rightful’ successor in the mutt in Madurai on Sunday.

Nityananda , who landed in a controversy after a sleazy video footage telecast by a TV channel showed him with an actress and is facing criminal cases, received blessings from the senior pontiff after presenting him a golden crown and tulsi garland.

The senior in turn crowned him as the inheritor of Madurai aadheenam and wore a rudraksha mala around his neck.

The aadheenam conferred the title, Guru Maha Sannidhanam Srila Sri Paramahamsa Nithyananda Sri Gnanasambanda Desika Paramacharya Swamigal, on him as the controversial godman’s followers applauded.

T. Suresh Babu, president of Sandigeswara Nayanar Narpani Sangam, claimed he was sent as a representative of other Saivite mutts of Turuvaduthurai, Dharumai, Perur, Tiruppanandhal and Kundrakudi to express their displeasure over Nityananda’s pontiffship to Madurai aadheenam.

“Nityananda and his group did not allow me to meet the pontiff in person. Hence, I had to meet him in their presence and two police officials accompanied me fearing my safety,” he told Deccan Chronicle.

“When I told the sannidhanam that the Saivite world is shocked over Nityananda being declared as his successor and the move has only brought disrepute to the mutt, aadheenam said he is the only ‘fit saint’ who can carry forward Tirugnana Sambandar’s (visionary saint of Saiva Siddhanta philosophy) legacy,” he said.

“I was also shocked to hear him speak for the very first time in singular about the other mutt heads who had objected to Nityananda ‘s pontiffship,” he said.

Babu said the senior pontiff has become a “prisoner of circumstances”.

He ruled out the possibility of aadheenam being lured by money as the mutt has several thousands of crores worth properties. “Aadheenam is trapped. His life is in danger. We suspect a conspiracy to grab the mutt’s properties,” Babu alleged.

Hindu Makkal Katchi announced it would mobilise all mutt heads to agitate for the removal of Nityananda from the pontiffship to protect the sanctity of Madurai aadheenam. – Deccan Chronicle, Chennai, 30 April 2012

Arun SampathProtest greets new pontiff of Madurai Aadheenam

Madurai: Tension prevailed at the Madurai Aadheenam here on Sunday after members of a Hindu outfit entered into a heated argument with supporters of Nithyananda over the legitimacy of appointing the controversial godman as the 293rd pontiff of the mutt. Members of the Hindu Makkal Katchi, led by Arjun Sampath, also staged a protest condemning Nithyananda’s appointment and demanded that the government intervene and safeguard the glory of the ancient mutt.

Meanwhile, Arunagirinatha Ganamandhasikar, the current pontiff of the mutt, categorically told members of the Hindu outfit that during his recent Nithyananda had all the qualities to be appointed as the 293rd pontiff and it was not necessary to consult other Aadheenams before appointing a pontiff for Madurai Aadheenam.

“I was a bit reluctant to accept the responsibility because of the controversy surrounding me, but Arunagirinatha gave me the confidence. I will run the mutt as per his advice,” said Nithyananda.

Nithyananda also said that 50 members from his ashram would soon visit the Madurai Aadheenam to manage the mutt and he would also open free schools in the district.

Hindu Makkal Katchi leader Arjun Sampath and others demanded talks with Arunagirinatha in connection with the appointment of Nithyananda as pontiff.

However, Arunagirintha reportedly refused to meet anyone but later, six members, including Sandikeswarar Narpani Mandram leader Suresh Babu, were allowed to meet him.

While Arunagirintha defended the appointment, supporters of Nithyananda raised slogans in praise of him. Outraged by this, Hindu outfit members raised slogan against Nithyananda.

Police then pacified the agitators and brought them out of the mutt. – The New Indian Express, Chennai, 20 April 2012

Madurai Aadheenam ParamacharyaPontiff defends decision to make Nithy mutt head

Madurai: Amid protests by Hindu outfits, the pontiff of a Madurai mutt, Arunagirinatha Desikar, on Sunday defended his decision to appoint the scam-tainted godman, Nithyananda, as his successor.

“It is a well thought out decision for the welfare and growth of the mutt,” said the pontiff. The charges against Nithyananda are false and those levelling allegations against him are ignorant, he told reporters at a press conference along with Nithyananda, even as an angry group of activists from Hindu outfits staged a protest outside the mutt.

Neither the government nor Hindu outfits could interfere in the mutt’s matters, he said. “I was looking for a successor for the Adheenam (mutt) for the past eight years. In this backdrop, I visited the ‘Nithyananda Dhyana peedam’ in Bangalore. The moment I saw him, a divine voice told me he was the right person. I spoke to Nithyananda about this. He hesitated due to the allegations levelled against him. But I convinced him Adheenam needs an individual with spiritual and administrative skills,” Desikar said. – TOI, Mumbai, 30 April 2012

Nithy & Ranjitha

More videos concerning the Nithyananda sex scandal can be viewed at  http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=nithyananda+ranjitha+videos&aq=1&oq=nithyananda+ranjitha

Earlier posts

  1. Nithyananda-Ranjitha Video – Nakkheeran
  2. Nithyananda gets Paramacharya Swamigal title, gives Madurai Aadheenam one crore rupees – Media Reports  https://bharatabharati.wordpress.com/2012/04/28/nithyananda-gets-paramacharya-swamigal-title-gives-madurai-aadeenam-one-crore-media-reports/
  3. “Nithyananda insulting judiciary, Hinduism” – Hindu Makkal Katchi  https://bharatabharati.wordpress.com/2011/07/18/nithyananda-insulting-judiciary-hinduism-hindu-makkal-katchi/
  4. CID charges Nithyananda with rape, sodomy, cheating, conspiracy, and criminal intimidation – Media Reports    https://bharatabharati.wordpress.com/2010/11/30/cid-charges-nithyananda-with-rape-sodomy-cheating-conspiracy-and-criminal-intimidation-media-reports/
  5. Nithyananda-Ranjitha sex tape not tampered – CID  https://bharatabharati.wordpress.com/2010/06/10/nithyananda-ranjitha-sex-tape-not-tampered-cbi/
  6. Nithy arrested in Himachal Pradesh – Media Reports  https://bharatabharati.wordpress.com/2010/04/21/tantrika-nityananda-arrested-in-himachal-pradesh-media-reports/
  7. Sex, lies, a feature film, Nithy & Ranjitha – Kunal M. Shah  https://bharatabharati.wordpress.com/2010/04/06/sex-lies-a-feature-film-nithy-and-ranjitha-kunal-m-shah/
  8. Nithy resigns from ashram and associated trusts – Media Reports  https://bharatabharati.wordpress.com/2010/03/30/nithy-resigns-from-ashram-trusts-
  9. Nithy’s Defence Team: Sexist, Racist, and Xenophobic – Ishwar Sharan  https://bharatabharati.wordpress.com/2010/04/05/hindu-activists-sexist-racist-xenophobic-ishwar-sharan/
  10. The Nithyananda Mea Culpa Interview? – Rajiv Malhotra  https://bharatabharati.wordpress.com/2010/03/13/video-the-nityananda-mea-culpa-interview-rajiv-malhotra/
  11. Debutante Dharma-Gurus: Violating a civilizational patent – Sandhya Jain  https://bharatabharati.wordpress.com/2010/03/21/debutante-dharma-gurus-violating-a-civilisational-patent-sandhya-jain/
  12. Nithyananda videos:  A testing time for Hindus – Radha Rajan  https://bharatabharati.wordpress.com/2010/03/05/nityananda-videos-a-testing-time-for-hindus-radha-rajan/
  13. All videos available at  http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=nithyananda+ranjitha+videos&aq=1&oq=nithyananda+ranjitha

Nithy's Search

5 Responses

  1. This is good news.

    13 mutt heads oppose Nithyananda’s appointment

    http://expressbuzz.com/states/tamilnadu/13-mutt-heads-oppose-nithyananda%E2%80%99s-appointment/387686.html

    Like

  2. Who are we to believe? Our own CID or an unverified statement from a fake sadhu who has long ago lost his credibility?

    Who is PRWeb and what is their interest? Isn’t it just a PUBLIC RELATIONS website that puts out what is requested and paid for?

    How do we know the result from the US forensic lab is real and not concocted? How do we know their report was not bought?

    In India Nithy buys everything and everybody. Why not in the US too.

    We have given the link to the San Francisco Chronicle article at the bottom of the article. It is http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2012/04/27/prweb9450407.DTL. Go and see for yourself.

    Yes, the Church in India will milk this scandal for all it is worth. And as Hindus are divided and our Sangh Parivar are cowards or worse, we will not win any accolades for trying to get at the truth.

    By the way, do you think the video is morphed? We do believe it is a real video or we would not publish the little that is left of it here.

    Like

  3. I am not a devotee of Swami Nithyananda, but in all fairness, I feel compelled to chime in on this thread. In the frenzy to malign Swami Nithyananda, I would like all of you to note the following:

    http://tx0.org/3fw

    4 forensic video experts in the U.S. have clearly indicated that the video in question has been altered or “morphed,” adding that it was done very poorly.

    It it quite sad that you are posting an article about the swami from San Francisco Chronical without verification. To the best of my knowledge, SF Chronical has almost always written pejoratively about Hindus and Hinduism.

    Equally alarming is that Abrahamic cults and other forces are sworn enemies of Sanatan Dharma and Hindu saints and you are aiding them by fanning the flames of divisiveness to your own peril.

    Like

  4. With reference to the Shaivite traditions above, I would add that the Mutt has a deed and a legal status. It may also have trustees. The Mutt deed will describe in detail the rights and powers of the Mutt Head and of the trustees (if any). It will also describe the kind of person that the Mutt Head can select as a successor. Invariably it will state that the successor must be an unmarried brahmachari. The current Mutt Head has stated he can choose his successor at will unhindered. We will not know if this is true until the matter goes to court and the Mutt deed is produced. Only then will we know the powers of the Mutt Head.

    Nithy is known to everybody in Tiruvannamalai as a Mudaliar by caste. When he was running from the law he declared that he was a Dalit. He said he was being persecuted because he was a Dalit. Nobody has been able to locate his family in Tiruvannamalai. An uncle was discovered once in Tiruvoodal Street but ran away when he was questioned about Nithy.

    Yogi Ramsuratkumar stayed much of his life in Sannidhi Street and knew every detail of what was going on in and around the temple. In the ten years plus that I knew him, he never once mentioned Nithy. This is very unusual. If in fact Nithy comes from Tiruvannamalai as he claims and had become a sadhu at an early age, Yogiji would most certainly have known about it and also would have mentioned it to others.

    Like

  5. Would like to share a few facts about this unethical and unsanctioned appointment of Junior Pontiff :

    1. As per Saivite Mutt traditions only persons belonging to Saivite Vellala caste can become Thambirans (ascetics under the Mutt)

    2. The person should have never married

    3. He has to undergo four stages of Diksha (initiation) which would take not less than six years.

    4. Even after this rigorous training and cultivation of qualities only those who are Tapasvis should/could be ordained to succeed a Matathipathi.

    (I have not mentioned that the person should be a 100% M-A-N … since it is a condition that is usually presumed — and in case of Nithyananda this may come as a big handicap. The other issues that would certainly be raised would be related to his tainted past — and present)

    It is obvious from the above the appointment of Nithyananda as the next Peetathipathi lacks all vital ingredients and cannot be sustained ethically, per sasthras and legally. In my opinion, this appointment is a like a real estate or corporate sell out. Nithyananda is highly cash rich and he could have simply bought the Mutt from the current Mutt Head lock, stock and barrel. A successor-ship story is given to the takeover fact.

    As far as HR & CE is concerned – they are right in saying that they cannot interfere in the appointment of Heads of Aadheenams. But Courts have interfered and they will in this case as well.

    HR & CE is very wrong in saying that they should get a share of income of Mutts and Mutt temples for overseeing administration.

    Every Mutt is a religious denomination and they have every right to administer their affairs including their properties without Government interfering. The Mutts are looking after their temples.

    Not HR & CE. The Mutts need not pay Administrative fees to HR & CE and they should not.

    Like

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: