“Examine honestly the troubling episodes of our history; accept the truth and learn from it. Forgive, but do not forget. This truth will kill the poison that is coursing through a few extremists in India. Denial is not a cure for historical abuse. Truth is.” – Amish Tripathi
One of the greatest gifts that children can receive from their parents is an emotionally stable childhood. Materialistic trappings cannot compensate for the bliss of growing up in a well-adjusted, happy family; one where the child is not exposed to domestic violence, warring parents, physical or emotional abuse. Sadly, both research and anecdotal evidence indicate that many children are deprived of this blessing and grow up in dysfunctional families. They develop coping skills to handle traumatic experiences: Sometimes denial (convincing their conscious mind that no abuse happened) and at other times unfocused anger (allowing inner rage to poison their mind to the extent that they become hateful, even towards those unrelated to the abuse). One doesn’t need to be a psychologist to know that both approaches are unhealthy.
As it is with children, so it is with countries. Few countries can rightfully claim that they have no ‘history’ to contend with. But it is easier to gaze charitably at the past with quiet confidence when the country is successful. During my recent travels across the United States on a fellowship programme, it was apparent that the Anglo-Saxon American mind was unscathed by the oppression of British colonial rule (the African-American mind is another matter). My journey through the Arab world, however, told a different tale. They still cringe at the memory of the persecution and oppression they had suffered for centuries through Mongol, Turkish and later European conquests. The present-day outbursts of ‘unfocused anger’ in the Arab world could well be strongly associated with this historical abuse — besides other issues, I admit.
The psychological strategy of ‘denial’ however — where the victim convinces himself that no (or minimal) abuse happened — finds almost matchless expression in India.
One example of this is the attitude of many Indians towards the British Raj.
Many believe that, while there may have been some injustices meted out during the British Raj, overall, colonial rule was beneficial. Some even claim that the British created India, as, apparently, we weren’t a nation before their arrival. If one draws up a list of the excesses of the British Raj, the worst, we are told, was the Jallianwala Bagh massacre, where over 1,000 Indians were killed in cold blood. But is this the worst that they did? Not by a long shot. In the early 1940s, Winston Churchill consciously ordered a scorched earth policy in eastern India to halt the advancing Japanese army, which led to the death of 1.5 to 4 million Indians. That’s nearly as many as the number of Jews that Hitler ordered to their deaths. Late Victorian Holocausts by Mike Davis gives troubling accounts of the vast numbers — in the millions — killed by British policies. A little-known fact in India is that the edifice of the British Raj (and the white man’s ‘civilising mission’) was built on the biggest drug-running racket in the history of humanity. The British forced Indian farmers to grow opium, which was then smuggled into China. The Chinese economy — not to mention the lives of millions of Chinese — was destroyed through this trade. At the same time, millions of Indians died as food crops were forcibly replaced with opium (besides other crops for British trade), leading to recurring food shortages and famines.
These events have been carefully airbrushed from Indian history books. Why? Some will say that those who have dominated the Indian imagination for most of its independent history — the Indian anglicised elite — have obscured these facts due to loyalty to the country of their cultural ancestors: Great Britain. But I think that would be too grave a charge. I have interacted with many members of the anglicised elite. I admit that most of us would find it difficult to understand their strangely eccentric culture, but they are not 
traitors. They do love India in their own peculiar way; but many of them believe that Indians cannot handle the truth and ‘social peace’ can only be maintained by ‘airbrushing’ history to remove the ugly portions. Besides the British era, this also includes other painful historical episodes, like the brutal Turkic invasions of India in the medieval period, rated as one of history’s bloodiest conquests (read Tarikh-i-Ferishta to know more).
But denial leads to the repressed truth finding expression in ugly forms, resulting in hatred and anger, as we see in some parts of India today. It’s healthier to accept the truth and learn to handle it. Forgive, but do not forget. We should have detailed sections in our history books on the famines caused by British policies; and also on the massive British drug-smuggling business. We should honestly teach Indian students the truth about the horrific brutality of medieval Turkic invaders.
But we must also teach that history should not extend itself into the present and colour our evaluations of a people today. For example, we don’t need to settle scores with today’s British for the actions of their ancestors. And furthermore, if Indian Christians are not blamed for British excesses just because the British happened to be Christians, why should Indian Muslims be blamed for the vicious Turkic/Mongol/Persian conquests, just because these foreigners happened to be Muslims? We were slaves under foreign rule for 800 years. Let’s not blame our fellow Indians for the crimes of those barbaric foreigners.
Many civilisations have at some point of time been victims, and at other times, oppressors. Present conduct rather than past ills should determine the way a people are judged today.
My suggestion: Examine honestly the troubling episodes of our history; accept the truth and learn from it. Forgive, but do not forget. This truth will kill the poison that is coursing through a few extremists in India.
Denial is not a cure for historical abuse. Truth is. Satyamev Jayate. – Hindustan Times, 21 November 2014
» Amish Tripathi is a banker who has become the best-selling author of the Shiva Trilogy. He is passionate about history, mythology and philosophy.
Filed under: india | Tagged: christians, hindu history, hindus, history, imperialism, india, indian christians, indian history, indian muslims, indian politics, marxist historians, negationism, politics, secularism, secularism-nehruism |
BHARATA BHARATI 
What about Aryan invasion? There has been genetic proof, too. And I agree with your article that we should forgive but not forget about the British and Turkish rule. But let’s also acknowledge how the invaders used religion as a way to control the population. About the Aryan invasion, we can also say that they(hindus) exploited the tribals. India is a diverse country and this diversity is come unfortunately with a oppression.
LikeLike
Amish Tripathi has admirably called for a true and honest examination of Indian history and its study by all Indians.
He has written a politically correct article, separating terrorism from religion as required by left-leaning academics in the West and secularist politicians in India (never mind that the terrorists themselves identify their activities with religion).
But he is himself in denial when he refuses to recognise the role religion played in the Turkic, Mongol, and Persian conquests of India and later British, Portuguese, French and Danish colonial impositions. All Muslim and Christian invaders used religion as a tool in gaining a foothold and later sovereignty in the country.
Religion continues to be used today as a tool of imperialism by the Americans. The big missionary NGOs operating in India, busy educating and alienating village youth from their native culture, report back to Washington. Their converts are sympathetic to the converting culture and not to the culture they have been converted from, a culture they have been taught to despise.
Even the Russians use religion in their subversion of the Ukraine. Russians are Orthodox and Ukrainians are Uniate Catholics. They hate each other like only good Christians can. When the Russians finally have their way in Ukraine, the first thing they will do is build a huge Orthodox cathedral in Kiev as a victory monument (they have done it before in Catholic Hungary), just as Babur had a victory mosque built in Ayodhya.
Certainly India’s thousand years of slavery should be recorded in the history books and not hidden from view as it is today, as Tripathi says. But it cannot be forgiven just like that because forgiveness cannot be given unless the wrongdoing has been admitted and forgiveness sincerely requested by the wrongdoer.
When it was suggested some years ago that the then Pope publicly admit the horrors of the Goa Inquisition and ask the indulgence of the Indian people for past wrongs, he was stopped by the Indian Catholic hierarchy who feared that Christianity would collapse in India if the Pope admitted any wrongdoing.
So what do we see today? The instigator of the Goa Inquisition, an arch-criminal who believed in forced conversion and temple destruction, who targeted children and taught them to target their parents, who held all things Hindu in utter contempt, being paraded through the streets of Goa and worshipped as a saint by Indian Christians with the connivance of the BJP state government.
This is the depths to which Indian politics and politicians has sunk today (we do not blame the Indian Christians as they have been deceived by their priests).
India is the only country in the world that allows religious minorities to influence state policy. In every other country of the world, religious and cultural minorities are required to integrate themselves into society and the national culture even as they are allowed to keep their religious identity.
India is one of the few countries in the world to allow different laws for different religious communities though this practice is against national integration and the Indian Constitution.
And India may be the only country in the world that lays the onus for keeping the peace on the majority Hindu community no matter what provocations the minorities may offer them.
Though he does not say it outright, Amish Tripathi is also asking Hindus to keep the peace and forgive their Christian and Muslim neighbours for being wilfully alienated from the mainstream due to the curious theories of their respective religions.
The solution to all these issues according to the BJP government in Delhi is development and more development. Well, it has fooled its Hindu constituency so far. Let us see if it can fool the foreign investors too.
LikeLiked by 1 person