Let us start with the very basics.
Only minimal contemplation will be needed to understand that Devas and Devatas are expressions of human subjectivity or Consciousness that can evolve in each individual and also collectively in each culture.
Why go too far? Start with the most familiar saying known to any Hindu.
“Matru Devo Bhava“
Matru = Mother
Devo = Illuminated entity
Bhava = Become
Every civilized individual most likely has deepest love for his/her mother.
Does every individual consider his/her mother to be “God” (A male divinity) ?
No, here the word “deva” is “generic” and includes deva, devata, and devi.
The word “bhava” may be closer to “let ____(mother) become” or “may ____ (mother) come into existence or evolve into — deva.”
This saying clearly does not equate mother with God. Neither does it say “Mother is God” and literally not even does it say “mother is Goddess.” There should be clear agreement among those who know elementary Sanskrit on this clarification.
In grammatically correct Sanskrit taking into account gender it may be argued that it should have been “Matru devi bhava“.
None dares amend such widely accepted “shloka” to do violence to the Rishi who may have composed this line by correcting the grammar of the original composer.
Humbly accepting the fact that mother can potentially become “deva” for each individual will lead to understanding of the word “deva.” It will also immediately illustrate that God and Deva are not the same, not even equivalents. So the realization that “Devatas” are not “Gods and Goddesses” should be by now the first cognitive milestone in accepting this new paradigm or discovery illustrating the intent of the saying, “matru devo bhava.”
How then in human subjectivity or Consciousness (individual and collective) “mother” can “become””deva“? How does she attain the sacredness, awe, respect, love, deserving worship from the “child”? That is the bhakti bhava.
Please do not confuse this saying with “Twameva Mata, Pita twameva” addressed to “Mama Deva, Deva.” The logic in this instance is reversed compared to that of “Matru devo bhava.” (This will be addressed in the future articles).
It is now simple to see the development of the rudimentary consciousness in the infant that is totally dependent on his/her mother and has no independent existence (no resources to survive without the mother).
The infant starts discovering the mother in his/her consciousness and begins to form the image of the mother and “She” becomes his/her primary object of love. In this state the “Mother” has literally the full life-giving power and infant is instinctively and genetically programmed to know this. Any separation from the mother is likely to lead potentially to loss of life in this early phase of life. An immense gratitude for the unconditional love of the mother is present in the Unconscious of each human being.
Such gratitude and love becomes repressed in the mother child relationship over the years although the immense love and respect lingers on throughout for most individuals.
Contemplating on mother over the years of psychological growth and development, and for females especially by experiencing their own motherhood, leads to a new realization of the sacrifices mother may have made to give every thing one now has and enjoys. This enlightenment is prayed for in “Matru Devo Bhava.” Fortunate are those Hindus who have attained such enlightenment and bhakti bhava towards their mothers and by generalizing towards all “mother” or “matru“. This takes years of maturation from infantile dependency driven attachment to exaltation of the “Matru” tatva. Matru tatva has been present eternally but it requires maturation of the individual to appreciate it as a devata.
Such enlightenment emerging from the human Unconscious is a unique phenomenon of human consciousness. The objects or principles (tatvas) illuminated by such enlightenment attain the status of Devas, Devatas, and Devis.
A great injustice and violence done to the Hindu culture disparaging its unique concepts of sacred relationships with Devas and Devatas was inadvertently the result of an erroneous translation of these indigenous Sanskrit terms when they were translated by “whosoever” as “Gods” and “Goddesses.”
More on this in an elaborate article on this very theme to be published by special request of “Vijayavani” and its editor Shrimati Sandhya Jain. This article and the previous ones by this author “Achintyachintaka” are prelude to this new paradigm in the science of consciousness. This paradigm does not diminish the bahkti but enhances it by enriching the insights into origin of each devata and its very intimate relationship with the physical, psychological, and spiritual being of humans with all the finest highly evolved emotions poured into the devatas who are not just “idols.”There indeed is a very intimate connections of all Hindus with their respective devas and devatas.
Let all Hindus get in touch with the richness of their Unconscious which was so very poetically glorified by their Vedic Rishis. They have not repudiated the drives but have exalted them. The connection with ocean, Varuna, connection with Prana in Hanumana, precursor of potential energy in Shesha, can all be viewed as present in the microcosm and also in the macrocosm and the beauty of it all is that they are all so real and eternally present for Hindus to uplift their consciousness through Agamashastra. It is not the ritual by itself but the bhava and Bhakti entailed in it that transforms the consciousness to a higher and higher level, if simultaneously evolving into higher level of tatva jnana, knowledge of the eternal principles each deva, devata and devi stand for eternally.
» The views expressed in this article are the author’s own.
» Dr. Achintyachintaka is a Hindu by birth and a Psychiatrist by profession who practices in the US.
Filed under: india | Tagged: culture, devas, devatas, god, goddess, gods, hindu, hinduism, human subjectivity, philosophy, polytheism, psychiatry, psychology, religion, rituals, sanskrit, sanskrit literature |























The best recorded example of pluralism in praise of ones own personal God is the meeting of the spiritual giants. Gopalakrishna Bharathi , a Siva Bhakt and Saint Thyagaraja in the 19th century. This actually happened and is recorded by many in Thanjavur. When Saint Thyagaraja , realised the spark of devotion in Gopalakrishna Bharathi, He requested him to compose a kriti in Abogi Ragam. G Bharathi composed the immortal lyrics in Tamil ” Sabhapathikku Veru Deivam Samanam Aaguma” which translates as ” Can there be a God equal to Sabhapathi , refering to His (GBs) personal God, Lord Shiva There was wholesome appreciation by Saint Thygaraja for this composition. Next day , Saint Thygaraja composed ” Rama Nee Samanam Evaru ” in Telugu. refering ” Can there be anybody equal to you” . This was also appreciated by G Bharathi by a prema alingan like the immortal and spiritual hug of Hanumanaji with Lord Rama, which adorns the homes of many Hindus. This happened in the 19th century .
I feel embedding silliness from monotheism , which was a construct to imperialism , with variations to one God of the three ( two to be sure) Abrahamic religions has led to confusion , conning ( con humans), and masqueraders indulging in embezzling Sanatan Dharma.
LikeLike
I have just now responded to the other article where A gives us his response.
LikeLike
Dr. Rajiva, pls see his response on the other article. He has not understood our comments or he is deliberately distorting them.
This doctor is subverting Hindu Dharma from the inside — as he is accepted as a Hindu insider — and readers must be made aware of this.
Unfortunately I cannot continue this comment for technical reasons and have to close for the time being.
LikeLike
@IS thankyou for publishing this article even though your comments indicate that you do not agree with any of it.
My own comment is : the terminology of the article suggests a subjectivism that the author does not intend. The words, inner cosmos and outer cosmos (ARS)would have helped the reader to understand the Vedic roots of the worship of Devas and Devatas as objective realities, not products of human consciousness.
LikeLike
Dr. Achintyachintaka is infatuated with his new psychological paradigm to explain the existence of Devas and Devatas. He is not listening to anybody else so there is no reason to comment further on his theory (which is not new and was already discared in the 1970s). What we have had to say is already posted in the comments section at https://bharatabharati.wordpress.com/2012/10/13/why-focus-on-consciousness-to-understand-devas-and-devatas-achintyachintaka/.
Vijayvaani is a good place for Dr. Achintyachintaka to publish. The communists and other secularists there will gobble up his explanation for the Hindu psychological aberration — as they see it — and put it to their own anti-Hindu uses and abuses. So will the Jesuits who are much better at casuistry and inventing specious theories than the doctor is, find in this article a good tool to minimise Hinduism’s universal value.
It is all very unfortunate, but this is what happens when a Western academic pronounces on Eastern things that he does not know about. He may not agree, but experience overrides theory here on all counts. Our experience has consigned his theory of Hindu religion to the dustbin. But there is a social and cultural problem too, as the half-educated modern Indian Hindu is always looking for scientific proof of his religion — itself a grave misunderstanding that should not be: religion is not proved by science but by experience — and the theory presented in Dr. Achintyachintaka’s article may be just the trigger to further alienate the man from his ancient religion and culture. For if the Devas and Devatas are a product of the Hindu mind — like a Bollywood movie — then the Hindu mind is greater than the Devas and Devatas and there is no need to waste time with them any longer.
LikeLike